Skip to main content

Table 4 Results obtained using images 4 times smaller than the original resolution

From: Semi-automated quantitative Drosophila wings measurements

 

Dataset = 599

Dataset = 100

 

1 degree rotation

5 degree rotation

1 degree rotation

5 degree rotation

Point

Within 2 stddev (%)

Mean Pixel Dev

Within 2 stddev (%)

Mean Pixel Dev

Within 2 stddev (%)

Mean Pixel Dev

Within 2 stddev (%)

Mean Pixel Dev

b

84.8

5.55±3.53

84.2

5.65±3.84

85.1

5.67±3.91

85.0

5.72±3.74

c

52.7

7.92±5.94

53.0

7.97±6.00

48.9

8.47±6.33

49.0

8.45±6.45

d

25.0

7.03±9.16

27.2

6.99±9.62

24.6

7.97±10.9

26.5

7.77±10.6

e

59.7

5.31±6.19

62.3

5.55±7.23

55.7

6.61±8.76

55.4

6.91±9.54

f

8.33

10.4±14.4

8.17

9.84±13.5

9.89

12.2±16.7

10.1

12.6±16.8

g

36.8

8.65±9.95

37.7

9.23±10.7

33.5

11.7±13.5

32.8

12.0±13.4

i

27.7

6.25±6.73

28.7

6.24±6.93

27.9

6.64±7.49

27.3

6.57±7.33

j

36.3

4.63±5.21

34.0

4.96±6.34

34.2

5.35±6.11

33.1

5.76±7.31

l

22.8

26.7±34.2

23.0

26.3±34.2

17.9

30.5±35.0

17.4

30.6±35.4

m

48.8

16.2±13.7

47.0

16.3±13.4

48.1

16.1±13.8

47.6

16.1±13.6

  1. The results of using different a dataset of size 599 and 100 are shown as well. As shown in the table, using a larger dataset yields a more accurate result. Also note that key points a, h, k are excluded as these key points are annotated by the users and are thus not being predicted