Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance of WMAGT and other compared methods on three benchmark datasets

From: Fusing graph transformer with multi-aggregate GCN for enhanced drug–disease associations prediction

Datasets

NIMCGCN

DRWBNCF

Ghasemian’s model

VAGE

DRGBCN

WMAGT

AUROC

Fdataset

0.7428 ± 0.0276

0.8781 ± 0.0192

0.8902 ± 0.0328

0.9163 ± 0.1052

0.9326 ± 0.013

0.9353 ± 0.012

Cdataset

0.7928 ± 0.0248

0.8928 ± 0.0154

0.9114 ± 0.0292

0.9551 ± 0.0842

0.9454 ± 0.0091

0.9458 ± 0.0114

LRSSL

0.8661 ± 0.0165

0.8297 ± 0.0161

0.8791 ± 0.0359

0.8856 ± 0.0536

0.9437 ± 0.005

0.9434 ± 0.0083

Average

0.8006

0.8669

0.8936

0.9189

0.9405

0.9415

AUPR

Fdataset

0.0558 ± 0.0106

0.4638 ± 0.0548

0.4046 ± 0.0683

0.0589 ± 0.0429

0.4087 ± 0.0281

0.5231 ± 0.0487

Cdataset

0.0751 ± 0.0138

0.5801 ± 0.0332

0.4881 ± 0.1047

0.0608 ± 0.0355

0.4517 ± 0.0423

0.6 ± 0.0429

LRSSL

0.1807 ± 0.0204

0.4033 ± 0.0201

0.4925 ± 0.1166

0.0381 ± 0.0144

0.2558 ± 0.033

0.3651 ± 0.026

Average

0.1039

0.4824

0.4617

0.0526

0.3721

0.4961

  1. The bold indicates the best performing method on each metric