Table 4 Computational score averaging running time and memory usages
From: Comparative study on chromatin loop callers using Hi-C data reveals their effectiveness
Tools | Running time (%) | Memory (%) | Computational score (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
Chromosight | 100.00 | 0.00 | 50.00 |
cLoops*** | 90.20 | 56.02 | 73.11 |
cLoops2*** | 0.00 | 86.77 | 43.39 |
FitHiC2 | 87.43 | 100.00 | 93.72 |
FitHiChIP | 84.23 | 93.93 | 89.08 |
HiCCUPS* | 98.57 | 18.01 | 58.29 |
HiCExplorer** | 96.72 | 55.06 | 75.89 |
LASCA | 81.45 | 63.26 | 72.36 |
Mustache | 98.78 | 86.35 | 92.57 |
Peakachu | 98.95 | 89.95 | 94.45 |
SIP | 98.74 | 81.97 | 90.36 |