Skip to main content

Table 5 Representation of every tool performance in different categories

From: Comparative study on chromatin loop callers using Hi-C data reveals their effectiveness

Tools

Biological feature (CTCF, H3K27ac, RNAPII)

Consistency

Robustness in parameters

Computational efficiency: running time

Computational efficiency: memory

LASCA

*

**

*

*

**

cLoops***

***

***

**

**

*

cLoops2***

*

***

*

*

**

HiCExplorer**

**

**

***

**

*

FitHiC2

*

***

*

*

***

FitHiChIP

***

**

*

*

***

Peakachu

**

*

**

***

***

Mustache

*

**

***

***

**

Chromosight

***

*

*

***

*

SIP

**

*

**

**

**

HiCCUPS*

**

**

***

**

*

  1. Star (*) symbol tells the performance category of every individual tools. Tools are categorized in terms of performance in three categories: Excellent (***), Good (**), and Fair (*). HiCCUPS* and HiCExplorer** didn’t produce results at low resolutions and cLoops*** and cLoops2*** do not have a resolution parameter