Skip to main content

Table 4 TCGA breast cancer data (N = 960, events = 196). The prediction performance of stacking and the other methods (mean (SD)). Results are based on 100 random splits of the original data to training set (N = 480) and test set (N = 480) (19 candidate pathways)

From: A non-negative spike-and-slab lasso generalized linear stacking prediction modeling method for high-dimensional omics data

 

Deviance

AUC

Brier score

Misclassification

Penalty and group penalty methods

Lasso

479.216 (20.363)

0.587 (0.037)

0.160 (0.008)

0.203 (0.014)

MCP

481.482 (23.224)

0.575 (0.045)

0.161 (0.009)

0.203 (0.015)

SCAD

481.901 (26.133)

0.586 (0.040)

0.160 (0.008)

0.203 (0.014)

gsslasso

479.552 (21.890)

0.594 (0.031)

0.160 (0.009)

0.203 (0.013)

grlasso

481.971 (18.018)

0.554 (0.035)

0.161 (0.008)

0.203 (0.013)

grMCP

487.903 (26.992)

0.537 (0.033)

0.163 (0.009)

0.204 (0.015)

grSCAD

481.545 (18.039)

0.559 (0.034)

0.161 (0.008)

0.202 (0.014)

cMCP

497.776 (49.826)

0.577 (0.038)

0.165 (0.013)

0.210 (0.021)

Model stacking methods

nsslasso (Lasso)

481.597 (20.492)

0.598 (0.027)

0.161 (0.008)

0.207 (0.013)

nsslasso (network)

485.152 (16.481)

0.583 (0.010)

0.163 (0.007)

0.208 (0.011)

nsslasso (KNN)

488.225 (21.950)

0.549 (0.035)

0.163 (0.009)

0.204 (0.013)

nsslasso (NBa)

489.239 (19.413)

0.531 (0.022)

0.163 (0.008)

0.202 (0.014)

nsslasso (RF)

486.269 (20.569)

0.551 (0.032)

0.162 (0.008)

0.203 (0.013)

L-BFGS (Lasso)

476.821 (18.592)

0.602 (0.026)

0.159 (0.008)

0.202 (0.013)

nLasso (Lasso)

480.495 (18.962)

0.583 (0.042)

0.161 (0.008)

0.205 (0.013)