Table 4 Comparison of memory consumption (measured in Mbytes) and time (measured in seconds) between the algorithms biomapp::chip, homer, meme and prosampler grouped by k

Biomapp

10

19.34

251.50

95.17

422.70

4.69

208.02

11

15.83

307.61

150.88

489.64

2.62

221.99

12

21.53

326.33

192.79

664.13

2.36

235.98

13

13.25

310.64

40.45

514.13

1.41

190.08

14

15.99

370.37

34.08

576.42

3.68

262.31

15

10.43

343.74

28.53

683.56

4.05

271.53

16

15.84

381.98

24.34

527.36

7.01

281.87

18

23.00

420.45

34.17

478.62

11.25

374.58

21

9.79

838.70

15.10

868.92

4.47

808.49

Homer

10

65.81

542.56

85.76

575.83

52.47

524.70

11

258.96

867.76

421.93

1054.18

133.48

684.94

12

549.22

1368.86

1802.54

1944.38

152.97

1156.77

13

806.39

1613.70

1951.66

1796.67

171.83

1467.87

14

952.28

1825.39

1875.14

2103.16

213.74

1565.54

15

645.16

1826.03

1584.17

2062.00

326.13

1717.78

16

1174.47

1950.41

1952.69

2195.72

184.05

1592.81

18

763.16

1887.06

1931.68

2270.09

142.80

1595.04

21

497.58

1765.16

709.77

1824.43

285.39

1705.90

Meme

10

139.84

117.86

152.63

166.72

133.59

73.30

11

138.23

225.86

159.70

1319.03

122.78

72.28

12

137.20

242.56

155.45

1618.04

126.23

69.32

13

136.74

202.81

153.11

538.06

118.93

72.25

14

140.46

223.61

156.88

409.22

129.15

73.24

15

139.28

240.67

152.55

1491.57

130.57

75.79

16

139.92

218.37

152.61

338.57

129.52

102.36

18

143.33

248.87

152.39

328.58

136.32

135.78

21

134.64

86.45

143.97

93.61

125.32

79.28

Prosampler

10

31.15

350.59

47.54

482.50

16.71

232.54

11

62.76

563.89

418.14

2796.34

15.60

199.07

12

69.60

603.25

518.37

3500.79

14.26

213.74

13

55.79

526.55

155.40

1166.94

16.35

235.40

14

61.46

571.55

112.23

909.96

17.21

226.32

15

81.32

566.79

655.92

2596.81

16.70

236.42

16

58.93

558.32

97.11

817.34

25.89

335.26

18

69.08

626.60

91.61

794.47

34.94

400.59

21

20.13

259.94

21.58

265.49

18.68

254.39