BioMoby extensions to the Taverna workflow management and enactment software
© Kawas et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 25 September 2006
Accepted: 30 November 2006
Published: 30 November 2006
As biology becomes an increasingly computational science, it is critical that we develop software tools that support not only bioinformaticians, but also bench biologists in their exploration of the vast and complex data-sets that continue to build from international genomic, proteomic, and systems-biology projects. The BioMoby interoperability system was created with the goal of facilitating the movement of data from one Web-based resource to another to fulfill the requirements of non-expert bioinformaticians. In parallel with the development of BioMoby, the European myGrid project was designing Taverna, a bioinformatics workflow design and enactment tool. Here we describe the marriage of these two projects in the form of a Taverna plug-in that provides access to many of BioMoby's features through the Taverna interface.
The exposed BioMoby functionality aids in the design of "sensible" BioMoby workflows, aids in pipelining BioMoby and non-BioMoby-based resources, and ensures that end-users need only a minimal understanding of both BioMoby, and the Taverna interface itself. Users are guided through the construction of syntactically and semantically correct workflows through plug-in calls to the Moby Central registry. Moby Central provides a menu of only those BioMoby services capable of operating on the data-type(s) that exist at any given position in the workflow. Moreover, the plug-in automatically and correctly connects a selected service into the workflow such that users are not required to understand the nature of the inputs or outputs for any service, leaving them to focus on the biological meaning of the workflow they are constructing, rather than the technical details of how the services will interoperate.
With the availability of the BioMoby plug-in to Taverna, we believe that BioMoby-based Web Services are now significantly more useful and accessible to bench scientists than are more traditional Web Services.
The BioMoby project [1–3] began in 2001 as an initiative of the model organism database community and other interested parties to define standards and technologies that would facilitate greater interoperability between Web-based bioinformatics and biological resources. It now boasts greater than 50 independent host providers spanning five continents, and offering more than 800 data retrieval and analysis services.
The interoperable behaviors observed between BioMoby services are derived by the service-providers adherence to an ontology-based messaging structure that allows both BioMoby clients and BioMoby services to look-up data-types in the ontology, and thereby interpret and parse them correctly. In addition to this, an ontology-aware registry, MOBY Central, is capable of brokering the interactions between a client holding a particular data-type and/or with specific analytical requirements and the service providers who can operate over that type of data, or ontologically compatible types, through queries over the relevant ontologies. In this way, MOBY Central can suggest a subset of Services from its database which are guaranteed to be capable of consuming the client's in-hand data.
BioMoby-compliant Web Services are becoming increasingly easy to design and deploy thanks to a myriad of tools available to service providers through the open-source BioMoby project, and collaborating projects such as myGrid [4, 5] and the Generation Challenge Programme of the Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research ; however, until recently, the full capabilities of the BioMoby system have not been available through any publicly available client program, and thus many of the most useful behaviors required custom programming to access.
Numerous clients have been created to utilize BioMoby (Gbrowse Moby , MOWServ , Remora , BlueJay , SeaHawk ). Most of these clients utilize the BioMoby Application Programming Interface (API) in a Web interface, allowing users to start with a piece of data, a GenBank gene identifier for example, and then discover services that consume that piece of information, followed iteratively by discovery of services that consume the output from the previous service, and so on. Some clients allow you to create and save workflows of services that can be re-used at a later date. So far, however, none of these clients have been capable of enabling interoperability between BioMoby services and non-BioMoby services, or of assembling and/or decomposing BioMoby data types at any point in the workflow to enhance service discovery.
The Taverna [7–9] workflow and enactment system from the myGrid project can "converse with the interfaces of Web Services and direct the flow of data between resources" . While Taverna was capable of accessing most typical Web Services, allowing end-users to drag-n-drop resources into a pipeline, it had not been able to exploit the BioMoby ontologies to enhance the process of service discovery. Importantly, Taverna was not able to verify if services added to the workflow were truly capable of consuming the output data from the previous service, nor could it (alone) suggest which services might be capable of doing so. As the number of resources available through the Taverna interface continues to increase (currently more than 6000!) this lack of guidance through the vast Service-space has been a high barrier to entry for the naïve end-user.
The 1.4 and greater releases of Taverna include the BioMoby plug-in and these are implemented as a Java 1.5 standalone application. The BioMoby plug-in implements the IProcessor interface of the scufl package to describe BioMoby services in Taverna. In order to run BioMoby services in Taverna, all services must also implement the ProcessorTaskWorker interface described in the scuflworkers package. Finally, in order for the workbench to discover BioMoby services, the BioMoby plug-in extended the Scavenger class from the scuflui package.
Traditional Web Services versus BioMoby Services
The key difference between traditional Web Services and BioMoby services is in the definitions of the input and output data structures. Traditional Web Services utilize XML schema to describe the basic syntax of their interface , but not its "intent". As such, an interface might define, for example, an xsd:String as one of its input parameters; however there is no way for a client program to determine if that String is intended to be a DNA Sequence or a PubMed abstract or any of the thousands of other bioinformatics data-types that are commonly represented as strings. To overcome this problem, BioMoby defines an ontology of bioinformatics data-types , and a XML representation of this ontology  such that the position of a node in the ontology precisely defines the XML syntax by which that node will be represented, and the name and definition of the node define precisely the purpose of that syntax – i.e. the nature of the data it will contain. Thus it is possible for a client program to precisely query the MOBY Central registry for services that operate with the in-hand data-type, and moreover, that in-hand data can be passed verbatim to the service provider, thus not requiring the client to include any complex data-rearrangement code.
The core Taverna interface
The Taverna interface includes three main windows:
The Available Services window provides a menu of possible widgets to add to a workflow, including both local Java Bean widgets, as well as remote Web Services. These are hierarchically organized based on the Web Service registry or WSDL file that contains their definitions.
The Advanced Model Explorer window provides details of all services and service-to-service connections that exist in the workflow under construction.
The Workflow Diagram provides a graphical display of the current workflow.
Taverna BioMoby extensions
A complete, annotated and illustrated example of building a biologically meaningful workflow is available online . Here, in the interest of space and clarity, we will focus only on the individual functionalities that have been added to Taverna by this plug-in, rather than how they might fit together in the context of any given workflow construction exercise. The BioMoby-specific extensions to Taverna include the following:
Addition of Moby Object constructors/deconstructors
In earlier releases of Taverna, it was possible to construct a base BioMoby data Object consisting of a database namespace and an ID number. Thus all BioMoby workflows in Taverna began with a database identifier. The lack of support for other BioMoby data-types prevented intermediate service outputs from being combined and integrated into more complex objects, and similarly, complex data-types could not be deconstructed to pass sub-components into further downstream services. Often, however, it is desirable to begin a workflow with a more complex data-type, and to construct and deconstruct data-types at arbitrary points along the workflow. This provides access to services, such as the various BLAST services, that consume sequence data with or without an associated identifier.
In the BioMoby API, a Secondary Parameter is a piece of data that is used to modify the behaviour of service execution, but is not useful for service discovery and is not modeled as a BioMoby Ontologically defined Object – for example, the e-value cut-off of a Blast service.
Semantically-aided workflow design
Most, non-Moby Web Services consume strings or numbers as input and produce strings or numbers as output. While these strings generally represent well-recognized bioinformatics data-types, the "intent" of any particular service parameter is opaque to Taverna, and traditional WSDL documents cannot type data more precisely than the limited number of XML schema primitives. BioMoby services, however, consume ontologically-typed data and, as such, services can be discovered that specifically consume these typed data entities. Thus, by making it possible in Taverna to query the BioMoby registry based on particular data-types, workflows could be constructed more intelligently. Moreover this would relieve the burden on the end-user of browsing through the >800 possible BioMoby services in the Available Processors list to identify a service of interest, and ensure that those services presented are guaranteed to be syntactically and semantically compatible in the workflow.
Enhanced support for Simple versus collection inputs and outputs
In BioMoby there are two ways to organize data objects when passing them to a service. Objects that should be processed individually are passed as "Simples", while objects that should be processed as a unit are passed as "Collections" (this is distinct from batch processing, where multiple inputs are passed in the same message, but are treated individually by the service). A collection contains one or more simples of the same data-type.
By default, the BioMoby plug-in to Taverna attempts to make sensible decisions on how to organize data when passing it between services that expect different packages. If an upstream service has just output a Collection (e.g. a Collection of DNA Sequences), and the downstream service it feeds into expects Simples (e.g. a Blast service, that consumes only one DNA Sequence at a time) the decomposition of the Collection into a series of Simples, and the iteration over these Simple inputs to the downstream service is automated. Conversely, if an upstream service is outputting Simples (e.g. a database Sequence retrieval by ID number) and the downstream service expects a Collection (e.g. a ClustalW multiple alignment service), the entirety of the upstream output is "wrapped" in a Collection and passed to the downstream service as a unit.
Taverna is among the most popular Web Service workflow design tools, and is the de facto client application for much of the BioMoby user community. Until recently, however, Taverna's support for the most powerful features of the BioMoby interoperability system has been limited. With the BioMoby Taverna plug-in, end-users now have the ability to:
Initiate workflows using any BioMoby Object of their choice
Compose and decompose BioMoby Objects to comply with a wider range of Service interfaces
Parse data out of BioMoby's XML message structure such that it can be used as input to non-BioMoby services
Assemble raw output data from non-BioMoby services into BioMoby's XML structure
Access the MOBY Central Web Service registry query system to achieve guidance during workflow construction, thus eliminating the need for the user to have prior knowledge of a particular service interface
Configure service parameters with guidance and sanity-checking of user-input
Construct workflows that automatically make correct decisions on how to package data as it passes between the various services.
Certain features that are still not available include the ability to limit semantic searching by the type of service operation, by output data-type, or by keyword; however the myGrid project is currently designing a service query interface, Feta , which includes this functionality and will be compatible with both traditional and BioMoby Web Services. As such, these additional features will be available in the near future.
The majority of functionality exposed by the MOBY Central API is now available via the Taverna graphical interface. When designing a workflow, the user-experience is simplified through a set of guided context-menu choices which ensure that only appropriate services are presented for selection, that selected services are appropriately connected into the workflow, and enable the user to easily move into and out of the BioMoby interoperability framework.
We believe that Taverna is now the most fully-featured client for BioMoby Web Services, and that these enhancements make the Taverna environment more accessible to bench scientists and non-expert bioinformaticians. We are now focusing our development efforts on enhancing the usability and visualization of the output data-sets within the Taverna environment.
Availability and requirements
Project Name: Taverna BioMoby Plugin
Project Homepage: http://taverna.sourceforge.net for regular Taverna releases including BioMoby plug-in; http://biomoby.open-bio.org/index.php/moby-clients/taverna for newest plug-in releases.
Operating Systems: Cross-platform
Programming Language: Java 1.4 or higher
Other requirements: Taverna core code
License: GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL)
Any restrictions to use by non-academics: None
EK and MDW are funded by an award from Genome Alberta, in part through Genome Canada, a not-for-profit corporation leading Canada's national strategy on genomics. Core funding for MDW's laboratory is provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). MS's work on the BioMoby plug-in was funded by the myGrid project, and we would like to acknowledge the myGrid team, in particular: the director of myGrid, Carole Goble; the Taverna lead, Tom Oinn; Pinar Alper; Duncan Hull; Chris Wroe; Robert Stevens; and Phil Lord. We acknowledge the support of the EPSRC through the myGrid (GR/R67743/01, EP/C536444/1, EP/D044324/1, GR/T17457/01) e-Science projects.
- Wilkinson MD, Links M: BioMOBY: An Open Source Web Services Proposal for Biological Data. Brief Bioinform 2002, 3(4):331–341. 10.1093/bib/3.4.331View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilkinson MD, Gessler DD, Farmer A, Stein L: The BioMOBY project explores open-source, simple, extensible protocols for enabling biological database interoperability. Proceedings of the Virtual Conference on Genomics and Bioinformatics 2003, 3: 16–26.Google Scholar
- The BioMoby Project Homepage[http://www.biomoby.org]
- The myGrid Project Homepage[http://www.mygrid.org.uk]
- Stevens R, Robinson A, Goble CA: myGrid: Personalised Bioinformatics on the Information Grid. proceedings of 11th International Conference on Intelligent Systems in Molecular Biology, 29th June–3rd July Brisbane, Australia. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(Suppl 1):i302-i304.Google Scholar
- The Generation Challenge Programme Web Services Development Homepage[http://moby.generationcp.org/]
- Oinn T, Addis M, Ferris J, Marvin D, Senger M, Greenwood M, Carver T, Glover K, Pocock MR, Wipat A, Li P: Taverna: A tool for the composition and enactment of bioinformatics workflows. Bioinformatics Journal 2004, 20(17):3045–3054. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth361View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hull D, Wolstencroft K, Stevens R, Goble C, Pocock MR, Li P, Oinn T: Taverna: a tool for building and running workflows of services. Nucleic Acids Research 2006, (34 Web Server):W729-W732.Google Scholar
- The Taverna Project Website[http://taverna.sourceforge.net/]
- Web Service Description Language (WSDL)[http://www.w3c.org/TR/wsdl]
- The BioMoby Object Ontology[http://www.biomoby.org/RESOURCES/MOBY-S/Objects]
- The BioMoby Object Structure API[http://biomoby.open-bio.org/CVS_CONTENT/moby-live/Docs/MOBY-S_API/ObjectStructure.html]
- Wilkinson M: Gbrowse Moby: A web based browser for BioMoby Services. Source Code for Biology and Medicine, in press.Google Scholar
- Navas-Delgado I, del Mar Rojano-Munoz M, Ramirez S, Perez AJ, Andres Leon E, Aldana-Montes JF, Trelles O: Intelligent client for integrating bioinformatics services. Bioinformatics 2006, 22(1):106–111. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti740View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carrere S, Gouzy G: REMORA: A pilot in the ocean of BioMoby web-services. Bioinformatics 2006, 22(7):900–901. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Turinsky AL, Ah-Seng AC, Gordon PMK, Stromer JN, Taschuk ML, Xu EW, Sensen CW: Bioinformatics visualization and integration with open standards: The Bluejay genomic browser. Silico Biology 2005, 5(2):187–198.Google Scholar
- The Seahawk Applet[http://bluejay.ucalgary.ca/seahawk/]
- Taverna MOBY Plugin Tutorial[http://biomoby.org/TavernaMOBY.htm]
- The BioMoby Dashboard[http://biomoby.open-bio.org/CVS_CONTENT/moby-live/Java/docs/Dashboard.html]
- Lord P, Alper P, Wroe C, Goble C: Feta: A Light-Weight Architecture for User Oriented Semantic Service Discovery. In Proceedings of Second European Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 2005, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, May–June 2005. Springer-Verlag LNCS 3532; 2005:17–31.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.