Hybrid elementary flux analysis/nonparametric modeling: application for bioprocess control
 Ana P Teixeira^{1, 2},
 Carlos Alves^{2},
 Paula M Alves^{1},
 Manuel JT Carrondo^{1, 3} and
 Rui Oliveira^{2}Email author
DOI: 10.1186/14712105830
© Teixeira et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 23 October 2006
Accepted: 29 January 2007
Published: 29 January 2007
Abstract
Background
The progress in the "omic" sciences has allowed a deeper knowledge on many biological systems with industrial interest. This knowledge is still rarely used for advanced bioprocess monitoring and control at the bioreactor level. In this work, a bioprocess control method is presented, which is designed on the basis of the metabolic network of the organism under consideration. The bioprocess dynamics are formulated using hybrid rigorous/data driven systems and its inherent structure is defined by the metabolism elementary modes.
Results
The metabolic network of the system under study is decomposed into elementary modes (EMs), which are the simplest paths able to operate coherently in steadystate. A reduced reaction mechanism in the form of simplified reactions connecting substrates with endproducts is obtained. A dynamical hybrid system integrating material balance equations, EMs reactions stoichiometry and kinetics was formulated. EMs kinetics were defined as the product of two terms: a mechanistic/empirical known term and an unknown term that must be identified from data, in a process optimisation perspective. This approach allows the quantification of fluxes carried by individual elementary modes which is of great help to identify dominant pathways as a function of environmental conditions. The methodology was employed to analyse experimental data of recombinant Baby Hamster Kidney (BHK21A) cultures producing a recombinant fusion glycoprotein. The identified EMs kinetics demonstrated typical glucose and glutamine metabolic responses during cell growth and IgG1IL2 synthesis. Finally, an online optimisation study was conducted in which the optimal feeding strategies of glucose and glutamine were calculated after reestimation of model parameters at each sampling time. An improvement in the final product concentration was obtained as a result of this online optimisation.
Conclusion
The main contribution of this work is a novel bioreactor optimal control method that uses detailed information concerning the metabolism of the underlying biological system. Moreover, the method allows the identification of structural modifications in metabolism over batch time.
Background
Knowledge of intracellular metabolic fluxes is crucial to understand how different pathways interact and their relative importance within the overall metabolic processes. Metabolic flux analysis (MFA) is an established methodology that allows the quantification of such intracellular fluxes. In MFA, intracellular fluxes are calculated by applying steadystate material balances around intracellular metabolites. In general the number of reactions exceeds the number of metabolites resulting in undetermined systems of algebraic equations [1]. Such systems can be solved after measurement of the missing fluxes, which are typically uptake rates of substrates and secretion rates of metabolites, and also intracellular fluxes when the former are not enough.
The determination of metabolic flux distribution in undetermined systems may also be obtained by fluxbalance analysis (FBA) [2]. In FBA, unknown fluxes are determined by linear programming (LP), whereby a given objective function, related to a given cellular physiological state, is optimised. Typically, the maximisation of the growth flux defined in terms of biosynthetic requirements is used as the objective function [2–5]. In general, FBA provides flux distribution for a desirable physiological state, it is however uncertain that the provided solution is unique [6]. Frequently multiple optima are obtained which are a consequence of the existence of redundant pathways in the metabolic network conferring structural robustness to cells [7].
Metabolic Pathway Analysis (MPA) is another fluxbased analysis method. MPA, unlike FBA, do not look only at the properties of solutions selected by the statement of an objective, but study the full range of achievable biochemical network states that are provided by the solution space. Networkbased MPA has focused on two approaches, elementary modes (EMs) and extreme pathways (EPs) [8–10]. These approaches are very similar being EPs a subset of EMs. In certain network topologies the sets of EMs and EPs coincide. They are both unique for a given network and can be considered as nondecomposable steady state flux distributions using a minimal set of reactions. The difference is that EP analysis decouples all internal reversible reactions into two separate irreversible reactions (forward and backward directions) and EMs analysis accounts for reaction directionality. In this work we have adopted the EMs concept since it has broad application; EPs analysis can exclude important routes of the network giving misleading results [10]. MFA focuses on single flux distributions, but in a complex metabolic network of reactions there is a space of admissible flux distributions. The MPA allows the transition from a reaction based perspective to a pathwayoriented view of metabolism because each feasible steady state flux distribution can be represented as a nonnegative combination of EPs or EMs [8, 11].
Although fluxbased analysis methods have been mainly used for metabolic engineering [1, 12], they may also be useful in other phases of the bioprocess development cycle, namely for advanced bioreactor monitoring and control [13, 14]. The EMs concept is particularly attractive since it reduces network complexity to a minimal set of reactions. Provost and Bastin [13] exemplified the use of the EMs concept for dynamic modeling of a CHO culture. The main objective of the present study is to derive an optimal control method that incorporates the knowledge of the metabolic network of the biological system under study using the EMs technique. Modelbased off and online control techniques are today well established in both theoretical and practical terms, and have been widely applied for bioprocess optimisation (e.g. [15, 16]). The success of such methods is critically dependent on the quality of the supporting mathematical model. Not only accuracy in describing previously measured data but mainly the capacity to predict behaviour in unexplored states is the key for success. In previous studies [17, 18], an iterative batchtobatch optimisation scheme was developed and applied to the optimisation of recombinant BHK21 cultures. The method is based on the premise that in general the biological system under consideration is only partially known or even poorly known in a mechanistic sense. Following this principle, a flexible hybrid parametric/nonparametric representation of the biological system was adopted to support the batchtobatch optimisation scheme. It was verified that the model generalization capacity increases as more reliable mechanistic knowledge of cells is incorporated in the hybrid model. The algorithm presented here is essentially an extension to the previous batchtobatch optimisation scheme whereby the knowledge concerning the metabolic network is incorporated in the optimisation algorithm. The methods will be exemplified through the application to a recombinant BHK21 culture expressing the fusion glycoprotein IgG1IL2.
Results and discussion
Proposed methodology
Once the model is properly validated, it can be used for online intracellular flux distribution monitoring and for online process performance optimisation (Figure 2). So the next step is the online implementation of the newly developed hybrid model for process monitoring and/or optimisation in the sense of maximizing the process performance by manipulating the control inputs, i.e., the optimal control problem [16, 18–20]. The performance function includes a penalty term that accounts for the risk of model unreliability, i.e., extrapolation outside the model trust region. The empirical parameters are reestimated, followed by the reoptimisation of the future process time course whenever new measurements of the process state are performed. In the lines below we describe in detail the steps involved.
Elementary modes analysis
with N = {n_{ij}} a m × q stoichiometric matrix and v = {v_{j}} the vector of q metabolic fluxes with v_{j} denoting the net specific rate of reaction j. Some of the q reactions are irreversible, thus the respective fluxes must be nonnegative: v_{k} > 0 with k denoting the irreversible reactions in the metabolic network. The universe of solutions of system (1) forms a convex polyhedral cone in the solution space [21, 22]. It is a property of this system that the infinite set of solutions forming the convex polyhedral cone may be expressed as nonnegative linear combinations of a finite set of n fundamental vectors e_{i} called elementary modes (EMs):
These elementary modes e = {e_{i}} obey to constraints (1) and additionally to the elementarily constraint stating that there is no other nonnull flux vector involving proper subsets of the reactions participating in that particular EM [22]. In the context of the present work, there are two most important features of the EMs analysis: it allows to identify all possible pathways for the conversion of substrates into products, and opens the way to the quantification of the relative importance of pathways at a given process stage. The nonnull elements in each elementary mode, e_{i}, define a subset of active reactions of the overall metabolic network N, which are essentially pathways for the conversion of substrates into products.
Hybrid dynamical model formulation
The knowledge acquired from the EMs analysis is integrated in the hybrid model structure represented in Figure 1. This structure allows the introduction of the a priori knowledge concerning the metabolic reactions and intracellular kinetics, but it is also open to the possibility of existing missing parts in both cases. The EMs analysis provides a stoichiometric matrix, K_{ EM }, that may be augmented (to a K matrix) if important parts of the metabolism are missing. For instance, the energetic and biosynthetic metabolism may be known, but product metabolism may be unknown. In this case the product concentration or other compounds and respective reactions kinetics are included through matrix I independently of the EMs.
Even though information about cellular components is growing rapidly, enzymes concentrations and intracellular kinetic data are difficult to obtain. In this work the EMs kinetics are defined by the product of two functions of the system state: a mechanistic/empirical function (in case it is available) and a nonparametric function that represents what is extracted from data without mechanistic interpretation. This model structure can be formulated mathematically by the following two equations, which may be regarded as a general hybrid model for ideal bioreactor systems [18]:
r(c, w) = K⟨ϕ_{ j }(c) × ρ_{ j }(c, w)⟩_{j = 1,...,m} (3b)
with c a vector of n concentrations in the liquid phase, r a vector of n volumetric reaction rates, K a n × m coefficients matrix obtained from the elementary modes analysis, ϕ(c) are m kinetic functions established from mechanistic knowledge, ρ_{ j }(c,w) are m unknown kinetic functions, w a vector of parameters that must be estimated from data, D is the dilution rate, and u is a vector of n volumetric input rates (control inputs).
Identification of EMs kinetics
The reaction rate of elementary mode j is defined by the product ϕ_{j}(c) × ρ_{j}(c, w). The function ϕ_{j}(c) represents "known" mechanisms whereas ρ_{j}(c, w) represents unknown mechanisms. Redundancy and degeneracy are common problems in the determination of fluxes of biological networks [23, 24]. It is very important to define a priori the conditions under which metabolic fluxes are identifiable. A rank of matrix K equal to the number of unknown EMs and an equivalent number of measured states are necessary conditions for the identifiability of system (3). If identifiable, the unknown functions ρ_{j}(c, w) can be extracted from data using chemometric techniques such as multilinear regression, partial least squares, artificial neural networks and many other. In the frame of hybrid modeling, neural networks have been the most widely used technique for reaction kinetics modeling in biosystems [17, 18, 25–28]. We used a backpropagation neural network with a single hidden layer to define ρ_{j}(c, w):
ρ(c, w) = ρ_{max}s(w_{2}s(w_{1}c + b_{1}) + b_{2}) (4a)
with ρ = ⟨ρ_{ j }(c, w)⟩ a vector of m unknown reaction rates, ρ_{max} a vector of scaling factors with dim(ρ_{ max }) = m, w_{1}, b_{1}, w_{2} and b_{2} are parameter matrices associated with connections between the nodes of the network, w is a vectored form of w_{1}, b_{1}, w_{2}, b_{2}, and s(·) the sigmoid activation function. A batch neural network training method was adopted, whereby the parameters w are estimated in the sense of least squares employing a quasiNewton optimiser with gradients calculated by the sensitivities method [25, 28, 29] as described in the methods section.
Dynamic optimisation of culture operation: optimal control problem
In the dynamic optimisation step the process performance is optimised with respect to control inputs. This problem may be formulated mathematically as follows:
with J the performance index, t_{b} the batch time, f(·) a terminal performance function and g(·) a timedependent performance function. The algorithm used was the microgenetic algorithm [30] coded by Carroll [31]. For simplicity, a piecewise constant approximation of the control inputs u was adopted. The optimisation (5) is subject to the constraint defined by the hybrid dynamical model (3)–(4) (and indirectly by the metabolic network (1)) but possibly also by other equality and inequality constraints regarding process states, cellular states and control inputs. Due to the use of nonparametric functions, namely of the neural network function (4), it is important to evaluate the unreliability risk during the optimisation. After the EM identification step, the measured input space is clustered by ellipsoidal functions (see the methods section). The clustered input space forms the trust region, wherein the function (4) is considered to be reliable. Optimisation (5) is then further constrained by the risk of function (4) inputs being outside the trust region. The technique is described in detail in the methods section.
Case study: optimisation of recombinant BHK cultures
Process description
To illustrate the methodology described above it will be applied to a recombinant Baby Hamster Kidney (BHK21A) culture expressing a fusion glycoprotein (an antibody type 1 linked to an interleukin type 2, IgG1IL2) intended for cancer therapy [32]. The experiments were carried out in serum free and protein free medium (SMIF6, Life Technology, Glasgow, UK). The batch cultures were set up in a 2 1 reactor volume and the fedbatch cultures were set up at 3 different volume scales (2, 8 and 24 1). Sparger aeration was employed. Dissolved oxygen concentration was set at 15% of air saturation. Agitation rate used was 60 rpm; pH was set as 7.2 and controlled through the addition of CO_{2}. Experimental data of viable cells concentration and six extracellular species (glucose, glutamine, lactate, ammonia, alanine and desired product) were collected. Analytical techniques are described elsewhere [17].
Elementary modes
Elementary modes of the metabolic network considered.
EM_{1} :  Glucose→ 2 Lactate 

EM_{2} :  Glucose → 6 CO_{2} 
EM_{3} :  Glutamine → 5 CO_{2} + 2 Ammonia 
EM_{4} :  Glutamine → 2 CO_{2} + Ammonia + Alanine 
EM_{5} :  Glutamine → Lactate + 2 CO_{2} + 2 Ammonia 
Biomass and product synthesis
In addition to the catabolism, the anabolism and product synthesis must also be considered. For the sake of simplicity, the anabolism (biomass synthesis) was represented as a lumped equation combining the precursors of the main cellular building blocks (glucose, required for the synthesis of carbohydrates, lipids and nucleotides, and amino acids required for the synthesis of cellular proteins and some of them also for the synthesis of nucleotides). The stoichiometry established by WeiShou Hu and coworkers [36] for an hybridoma cell line was adopted in this work.
0.0208Glc + 0.0377Gln + 0.0133Ala + 0.0165Gly + 0.0096Val + 0.0133Leu + 0.0084Ile + 0.0033Met + 0.0081Pro + 0.0055Phe + 0.004Try + 0.0099Ser + 0.008Thr + 0.0Asn + 0.0077Tyr + 0.0004Cys + 0.0101Lys + 0.007Arg + 0.0033His + 0.026Asp + 0.0006Glu → Biomass (7)
The IgG1IL2 synthesis was also represented as a lumped equation as follows:
0.0104Gln + 0.0112Ala + 0.0139Gly + 0.0163Val + 0.0182Leu + 0.0061Ile + 0.0029Met + 0.0147Pro + 0.0072Phe + 0.0037Try + 0.0243Ser + 0.0163Thr + 0.0088Asn + 0.0077Tyr + 0.053Cys + 0.0136Lys + 0.0061Arg + 0.0043His + 0.0083Asp + 0.0096Glu → IgG1IL2 (8)
This equation is based on the amino acid composition of the antibody IgG1 plus the interleukin IL2 (both amino acid sequences are available at [37]). The carbohydrate content of this fusion glycoprotein was neglected since the glucose contribution is extremely small compared to overall glucose consumption.
Hybrid model structure
The EMs analysis provides a simplified reaction mechanism based on which the following hybrid model structure (equivalent to system 3ab) is formulated:
The state space vector is formed by the concentrations of compounds that intervene in the final reactions set (glucose, Glc, glutamine, Gln, lactate, Lac, ammonia, Amm, alanine, Ala) and additionally the concentrations of viable cells, X_{v}, and product, IgG:
c = [Xv, Glc, Gln, Lac, Amm, Ala, IgG]^{T}. (10)
 (i)
all reaction rates are specific (proportional to the concentration of viable cells),
 (ii)
the metabolic reactions considered are all irreversible (in this particular problem) and therefore the respective reaction rates are nonnegative
 (iii)
uncertainty in relation to kinetic constants and possible unknown saturation and inhibition effects.
 (iv)
only the concentrations of glucose, glutamine and ammonia have a significant impact on the specific reaction kinetics [41]. Lactate never reaches inhibitory levels in our experiments.
In the reaction rates of eq. (9) the term in parenthesis represents the a priori knowledge concerning the kinetics of the particular reaction (points (i) and (ii)) whereas the ρ_{i}, μ and π terms represent the uncertainty concerning the reaction kinetics (point (iii)) and are functions of three state variables (point (iv)). With this particular formulation, the vector of known kinetic functions is given by:
ϕ(c) = [X_{v}Glc X_{v}Glc X_{v}Gln X_{v}Gln X_{v} X_{v}Gln]^{T}, (11)
whereas the vector of unknown kinetics is given by:
ρ = [ρ_{1} ρ_{2} ρ_{3} ρ_{4} μ π]^{T} = ρ(Glc,Gln,Amm,w) (12)
The last term in eq. (9) is the control input vector u that in our case accounts for the volumetric feeding of glucose, F_{ Glc }, and glutamine, F_{ Gln }.
Identification of the EM kinetics
An important point for the identification of unknown flux functions (12) is that the rank of K is 6, thus the measurement of (10) (dim(c) = 7 > rank(K)) is sufficient for the observability of the EM kinetics. The other relevant point is the availability of sufficiently "rich" measurements to identify the "true" fluxes. Preliminary simulation tests showed that, for the system structure of eq (9), the "true" fluxes can be identified under typical fedbatch conditions (results not shown).
Experimental data of seven experiments (three batch and four fedbatch cultures) were used for the identification of the EM kinetics. Data of 5 experiments were used for parameter calibration whereas data of 2 experiments were used for model validation. The concentrations in the state space vector (eq. 10) were analyzed offline according to methods published elsewhere [17]. The neural network has three inputs, [Glc,Gln,Amm]^{T} and 6 outputs as defined by eq. (12). The number of hidden nodes was tuned heuristically in the sense of minimizing the error of the validation data set. The best result was obtained with 5 hidden nodes giving a total number of network parameters equal to 56. The output scaling factors reflect the maximum kinetic rates and were defined as ρ_{max} = [0.11 0.30 0.05 0.05 0.09 0.11]^{T}.
Metabolic interpretation
Figure 6 illustrates the EM kinetics identified by the hybrid model for two experiments, one batch and one fedbatch culture. The analysis of the flux distribution over the time course of bioreaction provides valuable information concerning the evolution of BHK metabolism and how to control the flux distribution through the feeding of glucose and glutamine.
In general, the metabolic activity of BHK cells during the cell growth phase is higher in the batch culture than in the fedbatch culture. The EM fluxes in the fedbatch experiments seem to be much more controlled than in the batch experiments. The high levels of glucose and glutamine at the beginning of the batch culture are mostly directed toward the overflow metabolism, i.e., waste production of lactate and alanine (EM_{1} and EM_{4}). The fedbatch culture, which had lower glucose and glutamine concentrations during the cell growth phase, started with substantially lower consumption rates of these nutrients, while maintaining the flux to biomass.
Glucose is consumed for biomass synthesis and is metabolized through elementary modes EM_{1} and EM_{2}. The consumption of this nutrient differs significantly from batch to fedbatch cultures. Cells use glucose in a more efficient way in fedbatch than in batch cultures particularly at the beginning of the culture, since the glucose metabolized to lactate (EM_{1}) is much higher in the batch experiment. These results are in agreement with several published works for other mammalian cells [42–44], where it is reported that high glycolytic activity of animal cells results from high residual glucose.
Glutamine is consumed for product and biomass synthesis and is metabolized through elementary modes EM_{3} and EM_{4}. The most energetic pathway involving glutamine, EM_{3}, is practically inactive during the cell growth phase of the batch culture, being glutamine preferentially converted into alanine. On the opposite, this elementary flux mode is an important pathway in the course of the fedbatch culture, representing 50% of the total glutamine consumption. The higher production rate of alanine at high glutamine levels (such as the ones present at the beginning of batch cultures) is consistent with observations made by Doverskog et al. [44] and Vriezen et al. [45].
Concerning the specific formation rate of glycoprotein, π_{IgG}, the product formation is consistently more stable in the fedbatch culture than in the batch culture. The product synthesis rate oscillates between 0,06 and 0,07 mg 10^{9} cells h^{1} in the former case whereas in the latter case the reaction is much lower in the beginning. This appears to be correlated with the overflow metabolism in the batch experiments, which seems to be detrimental for product synthesis.
Online culture optimisation
The hybrid model was further used for online optimisation of a fedbatch BHK culture. The model parameters were retuned online using the data from the running cultivation. A batch training scheme was adopted, whereby the data of the running cultivation along with the data of historical experiments were used for model adjustment (Figure 2). Some variables, namely glucose, glutamine, lactate and viable cells concentration, can be measured offline, with the results available after a short period of time (about 10 minutes). Therefore, at sampling times of 6 to 12 h, these measurements were stored in the training data set and then used for parameter identification using the same strategy previously described in the Identification of the EM kinetics section. The only difference was that the initial parameter values were those obtained in the offline training procedure. The ammonia, alanine and IgG concentrations were exclude form this model adjustment step because they were quantified only at the end of the experiment.
After the parameters retuning step, the glucose and glutamine feeding rates were reoptimised (u = [F_{GLC}, F_{GLN}]^{T}) in the sense of maximising the total amount of IgG1IL2 produced at the end of the experiment (13).
The optimisation (13) is subjected to the constraints of the process dynamics (equation 9), upper and lower bounds for the glucose and glutamine feeding rates, and the maximum risk of model unreliability, RISK_{max} (see methods section). The increase in volume is negligible in this problem, thus it was not considered in optimisation (13). The risk constraint states that the average risk must not exceed a given maximum level defined by the user. This restricts the feasibility domain to low risk regions and is essential for process optimisation supported by hybrid models since the blackbox model (4a,b) predictions degrade in regions of the input space with sparse measurements.
The microgenetic algorithm coded by [31] was used to solve optimisation (13). The population size and number of generations was 5 and 2000, respectively. A maximum risk level of 35% (RISK_{ max }= 0.35) was adopted during the online optimisation experiment. At each sampling time, the flow rates of the feeding pumps were updated according to the reoptimised feeding profiles of glucose and glutamine.
Medium optimisation
The kinetics of the elementary modes for the optimal strategy is presented in Figure 8b. The optimal strategy can be interpreted by means of intracellular flux distribution. The results were not much different from the elementary flux distribution of the fedbatch culture (Figure 6b). The main difference arises from the fact that the specific product formation (π _{IgG}) increases during the cell death phase as a consequence of the increase of the glutamine concentration.
Conclusion
The current work presents a hybrid modeling approach for bioprocesses that integrates information concerning intracellular metabolic fluxes, bioreactor transport phenomena and measured data. First, elementary flux analysis is used to reduce the biosystem metabolic network into a set of macroscopic reactions relating extracellular components only. A bioreactor dynamical model is then established from material balance equations of the compounds which intervene in the final reaction set. Nonparametric techniques are used for identification of the elementary modes kinetics from measured data. The method was successfully applied to a recombinant BHK21A cell line producing a fusion glycoprotein. A significant result is the achievement of the flux distribution over the runtime of a bioprocess. The so obtained information can be used to identify conditions that favour product formation. A fedbatch BHK culture performed with online optimisation supported by the proposed methodology allowed a 10% increase in the final productivity. Higher productivities are expected if starting nutrients concentrations are optimised. The developed tool promises to be advantageous for optimising the productivity of fedbatch biochemical processes since the transfer and adaptation to different cell lines is reasonably straightforward
Methods
Neural network training procedure
A batch least squares criteria of residuals in concentrations was adopted
with P the number of measured patterns, n the number of state variables, $\overline{c}$(t) and c(t,w) the measured and model state vectors. The concentrations were previously scaled by the measurements standard deviations. A quasiNewton algorithm with conjugate gradient with line search (MATLAB™ optimisation toolbox) was adopted.
The gradients ∂e/∂w can be evaluated using the sensitivities equations, which can be obtained by differentiating eq. (3a) in order to w, yielding, after some manipulations, the following linear timevarying system:
with
These equations must be integrated along with hybrid model eqs. (3)–(4). The initial value is (∂c/∂w)_{t = 0} = 0 because the initial state is independent of parameters w. The evaluation of matrices A and B require the sensitivities ∂ϕ_{j}/∂c, ∂ρ_{j}/∂w and ∂ρ_{j}/∂c. The first term is obtained by analytical derivation of known functions (in our case, by the derivation of eq. (9)). The other two matrices are obtained by backpropagating the identity matrix through the neural network. The backpropagation of a given identity matrix column 'i' results in the evaluation of vectors ∂ρi_{j}/∂w and ∂ρi_{j}/∂c.
Evaluation of prediction risk
The trust region is the subspace of the input domain, where the model was properly validated with experimental data, showing low modeling error. Model predictions, c*, outside the trust region may have a high risk, RISK(c*), of being unreliable. The use of unreliable model predictions for process control should be avoided. For this reason, the value of the risk is used as a constraint to the optimisation (13). Here, the trust region was defined by nc ellipsoidal clusters of the form:
with m_{j} the cluster centres and ∑ = diag{σ_{i}^{2}} the diagonal covariance matrix. The choice of the clusters number (nc) is done by trial and error according to the criteria of goodness of measurement density representation. The rule nc = P/3, with P the number of measured patterns normally provides acceptable results. The interpolation tolerances (IT) defines the distance to measured pattern such that y_{ C }> 0.5. The clusters width is then given by:
σ = [2 ln(0.5/n)]^{1/2} IT (M6)
The kmeans algorithm was used to calculate m_{j}. The final set of clusters forms a continuous density function f:c→v by applying the maximum operator:
The output v(c) is a scalar between 0 and 1 that can be interpreted as the degree of membership of c to the data set used for training the blackbox model (4). Low v values (i.e. c vectors out of the interpolation tolerance) are an indication of high risk of the black box model outputs being unreliable. Finally, the risk of black box model unreliability is given by: RISK(c) = 1  v(c) (M8)
Abbreviations
 BHK:

Baby Hamster Kidney cells
 CHO:

Chinese Hamster Ovary cells
 EM:

Elementary Flux Mode
 EP:

Extreme Pathway
 FBA:

Flux Balance Analysis
 IgG1IL2:

Imunoglobulin type one linked to interleukin type two
 LP:

Linear Programming
 MFA:

Metabolic Flux Analysis
 MPA:

Metabolic Pathway Analysis
Declarations
Acknowledgements
Support from Sartorius BBI and Merck KGaA is gratefully acknowledged. Financial support for this work was provided by the Portuguese Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia through project POCTI/BIO/57927/2004 and PhD grant SFRH/BD/13712/2003.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
 Stephanopoulos G: Metabolic fluxes and metabolic engineering. Metab Eng 1999, 1(1):1–11. 10.1006/mben.1998.0101View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Varma A, Palsson BO: Metabolic Flux Balancing: Basic Concepts, Scientific and Practical Use. BioTechnology 1994, 12(994–998):994–998.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Bonarius HPJ, Schmid G, Tramper J: Flux analysis of underdetermined metabolic networks: the quest for the missing constraints. Trends in Biotechnology 1997, 15(8):308–314. 10.1016/S01677799(97)010676View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Pramanik J, Keasling JD: Stoichiometric model of Escherichia coli metabolism: Incorporation of growthrate dependent biomass. Biotech and Bioeng 1997, 56(4):398–421. Publisher Full Text 10.1002/(SICI)10970290(19971120)56:4<398::AIDBIT6>3.0.CO;2JView ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Edwards JS, Ibarra RU, Palsson BO: In silico predictions of Escherichia coli metabolic capabilities are consistent with experimental data. Nat Biotechnol 2001, 19(2):125–130. 10.1038/84379View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Edwards JS, Covert M, Palsson B: Metabolic modelling of microbes: the fluxbalance approach. Environ Microbiol 2002, 4(3):133–140. 10.1046/j.14622920.2002.00282.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Lee DY, Fan LT, Park S, Lee SY, Shafie S, Bertok B, Friedler F: Complementary identification of multiple flux distributions and multiple metabolic pathways. Metab Eng 2005, 7(3):182–200. 10.1016/j.ymben.2005.02.002View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Schuster S, Dandekar T, Fell DA: Detection of elementary flux modes in biochemical networks: a promising tool for pathway analysis and metabolic engineering. Trends Biotechnol 1999, 17(2):53–60. 10.1016/S01677799(98)012906View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Schuster S, Fell DA, Dandekar T: A general definition of metabolic pathways useful for systematic organization and analysis of complex metabolic networks. Nat Biotechnol 2000, 18(3):326–332. 10.1038/73786View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Klamt S, Stelling J: Two approaches for metabolic pathway analysis? Trends Biotechnol 2003, 21(2):64–69. 10.1016/S01677799(02)000343View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Schilling CH, Letscher D, Palsson BO: Theory for the Systemic Definition of Metabolic Pathways and their use in Interpreting Metabolic Function from a PathwayOriented Perspective. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2000, 203(3):229–248. 10.1006/jtbi.2000.1073View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Edwards JS, Palsson BO: How will bioinformatics influence metabolic engineering? Biotechnol Bioeng 1998, 58: 162–169. 10.1002/(SICI)10970290(19980420)58:2/3<162::AIDBIT8>3.0.CO;2JView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Provost A, Bastin G: Dynamic metabolic modeling under balanced growth condition. J Process Control 2004, 14: 717–728. 10.1016/j.jprocont.2003.12.004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Mahadevan R, Burgard AP, Famili I, Van Dien S, Schilling CH: Applications of metabolic modeling to drive bioprocess development for the production of valueadded chemicals. Biotech and Bioprocess Eng 2005, 10(5):408–417.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Dhir S, Morrow KJ Jr, Rhinehart RR, Wiesner T: Dynamic optimization of hybridoma growth in a fedbatch bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 2000, 67(2):197–205. 10.1002/(SICI)10970290(20000120)67:2<197::AIDBIT9>3.0.CO;2WView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Mahadevan R, Doyle IF: Online optimization of recombinant product in a fedbatch bioreactor. Biotechnol Prog 2003, 19(2):639–646. 10.1021/bp025546zView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Teixeira A, Cunha AE, Clemente JJ, Moreira JL, Cruz HJ, Alves PM, Carrondo MJ, Oliveira R: Modelling and optimization of a recombinant BHK21 cultivation process using hybrid greybox systems. J Biotechnol 2005, 118(3):290–303. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.04.024View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Teixeira AP, Clemente JJ, Cunha AE, Carrondo MJ, Oliveira R: Bioprocess iterative batchtobatch optimization based on hybrid parametric/nonparametric models. Biotechnol Prog 2006, 22(1):247–258. 10.1021/bp0502328View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Bonvin D: Optimal operation of batch reactors: a personal view. J process Control 1998, 8: 355–368. 10.1016/S09591524(98)000109View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Banga JR, Balsacanto E, Moles CG, Alonso AA: Dynamic optimization of bioreactors: a review. Indian Natn Sci Acad 2003, 69: 359–401.Google Scholar
 Rockafellar R: Convex analysis. Princeton, Princeton University Press; 1970.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Gagneur J, Klamt S: Computation of elementary modes: a unifying framework and the new binary approach. BMC Bioinformatics 2004, 5: 175–196. 10.1186/147121055175PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Gadkar KG, Gunawan R, Doyle FJ 3rd: Iterative approach to model identification of biological networks. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6: 155. 10.1186/147121056155PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Stephanopoulos G, Aristidou AA, Nielsen J: Metabolic Engineering:. Elsevier Science 1998.Google Scholar
 Oliveira R: Combining first principles modelling and artificial neural networks: a general framework. Computers & Chemical Engineering 2004, 28(5):755–766. 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2004.02.014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Thompson ML, Kramer MA: Modeling chemical processes using prior knowledge and neural networks. Process Systems Engineering 1994, 40(8):1328–1340.Google Scholar
 van Can HJ, te Braake HA, Bijman A, Hellinga C, Luyben KC, Heijnen JJ: An efficient model development strategy for bioprocesses based on neural networks in macroscopic balances: Part II. Biotechnol Bioeng 1999, 62(6):666–680. 10.1002/(SICI)10970290(19990320)62:6<666::AIDBIT6>3.0.CO;2SView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Psichogios D, Ungar LH: A hybrid neural networkfirst principles approach to process modeling. AIChE Journal 1992, 38(10):1499–1511. 10.1002/aic.690381003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Schubert J, Simutis R, Doors M, Havlik I, Lübbert A: Hybrid Modelling of Yeast Production Processes. Chem Eng Technol 1994, 17: 10–20. 10.1002/ceat.270170103View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Krishnakumar K: MicroGenetic Algorithms for Stationary and NonStationary Function Optimization. In SPIE: Intelligent Control and Adaptive Systems. Philadelphia, PA; 1989:1196.Google Scholar
 Carroll DL: Chemical Laser Modeling with Genetic Algorithms. AIAA J 1996, 34(2):338–346.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Cruz HJ, Conradt HS, Dunker R, Peixoto CM, Cunha AE, Thomaz M, Burger C, Dias EM, Clemente J, Moreira JL, et al.: Process development of a recombinant antibody/interleukin2 fusion protein expressed in proteinfree medium by BHK cells. J Biotechnol 2002, 96(2):169–183. 10.1016/S01681656(02)000287View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Follstad BD, Balcarcel RR, Stephanopoulos G, Wang DI: Metabolic flux analysis of hybridoma continuous culture steady state multiplicity. Biotechnol Bioeng 1999, 63(6):675–683. 10.1002/(SICI)10970290(19990620)63:6<675::AIDBIT5>3.0.CO;2RView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Gódia F, Cairó JJ: Metabolic engineering of animal cells. Bioprocesses and Biosystems Engineering 2002, 24: 289–298. 10.1007/s004490100265View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Klamt S, Stelling J, Ginkel M, Gilles ED: FluxAnalyzer: exploring structure, pathways, and flux distributions in metabolic networks on interactive flux maps. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(2):261–269. 10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.261View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Gambhir A, Korke R, Lee J, Fu PC, Europa A, Hu WS: Analysis of cellular metabolism of hybridoma cells at distinct physiological states. J Biosci Bioeng 2003, 95(4):317–327.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 [http://www.rcsb.org]
 Reitzer L, Wice BM, Kennel D: Evidence that glutamine, not sugar, is the major energy source for cultured HeLa Cells. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 1979, 254(8):2669–2676.PubMedGoogle Scholar
 Ozturk SS, Palsson BO: Growth, metabolic, and antibody production kinetics of hybridoma cell culture: 1. Analysis of data from controlled batch reactors. Biotechnol Prog 1991, 7(6):471–480. 10.1021/bp00012a001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Ozturk SS, Palsson BO: Growth, metabolic, and antibody production kinetics of hybridoma cell culture: 2. Effects of serum concentration, dissolved oxygen concentration, and medium pH in a batch reactor. Biotechnol Prog 1991, 7(6):481–494. 10.1021/bp00012a002View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Cruz HJ, Freitas CM, Alves PM, Moreira JL, Carrondo MJ: Effects of ammonia and lactate on growth, metabolism, and productivity of BHK cells. Enzyme Microb Technol 2000, 27(1–2):43–52. 10.1016/S01410229(00)001514View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Xie L, Wang DIC: Material balance studies on animal cell metabolism using a stoichiometrically based reaction network. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 1996, 52: 579–590. Publisher Full Text 10.1002/(SICI)10970290(19961205)52:5<579::AIDBIT5>3.0.CO;2GView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Bonarius HPJ, Hatzimanikatis V, Meesters KPH, Gooijer CD, Schmid G, Tramper J: Metabolic flux analysis of hybridoma cells in different culture media using mass balances. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 1996, 50: 299–318. Publisher Full Text 10.1002/(SICI)10970290(19960505)50:3<299::AIDBIT9>3.0.CO;2BView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Doverskog M, Ljunggren J, Ohman L, Haggstrom L: Physiology of cultured animal cells. J Biotechnol 1997, 59(1–2):103–115. 10.1016/S01681656(97)001727View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Vriezen N, Romein B, Luyben KCAM, van Dijken JP: Effects of glutamine supply on growth and metabolism of mammalian cells in chemostat culture. Biotech and Bioeng 1997, 54(3):272–286. Publisher Full Text 10.1002/(SICI)10970290(19970505)54:3<272::AIDBIT8>3.0.CO;2CView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.