Open Access

uPEPperoni: An online tool for upstream open reading frame location and analysis of transcript conservation

  • Adam Skarshewski1,
  • Mitchell Stanton-Cook1,
  • Thomas Huber2,
  • Sumaya Al Mansoori1,
  • Ross Smith1,
  • Scott A Beatson1 and
  • Joseph A Rothnagel1Email author
BMC Bioinformatics201415:36

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-36

Received: 7 August 2013

Accepted: 11 January 2014

Published: 1 February 2014



Several small open reading frames located within the 5′ untranslated regions of mRNAs have recently been shown to be translated. In humans, about 50% of mRNAs contain at least one upstream open reading frame representing a large resource of coding potential. We propose that some upstream open reading frames encode peptides that are functional and contribute to proteome complexity in humans and other organisms. We use the term uPEPs to describe peptides encoded by upstream open reading frames.


We have developed an online tool, termed uPEPperoni, to facilitate the identification of putative bioactive peptides. uPEPperoni detects conserved upstream open reading frames in eukaryotic transcripts by comparing query nucleotide sequences against mRNA sequences within the NCBI RefSeq database. The algorithm first locates the main coding sequence and then searches for open reading frames 5′ to the main start codon which are subsequently analysed for conservation. uPEPperoni also determines the substitution frequency for both the upstream open reading frames and the main coding sequence. In addition, the uPEPperoni tool produces sequence identity heatmaps which allow rapid visual inspection of conserved regions in paired mRNAs.


uPEPperoni features user-nominated settings including, nucleotide match/mismatch, gap penalties, Ka/Ks ratios and output mode. The heatmap output shows levels of identity between any two sequences and provides easy recognition of conserved regions. Furthermore, this web tool allows comparison of evolutionary pressures acting on the upstream open reading frame against other regions of the mRNA. Additionally, the heatmap web applet can also be used to visualise the degree of conservation in any pair of sequences. uPEPperoni is freely available on an interactive web server at


5′UTR uORFs mRNAs Sequence conservation Short peptides Poly-cistronic Homology heatmaps


The discovery of mutations in upstream Open Reading Frames (uORFs) associated with disease [1] has brought renewed interest in uORFs and the peptides they encode. Bioinformatic analyses of cDNA and EST databases have estimated that up to 50% of all eukaryote mRNAs contain upstream AUG (uAUG)/uORFs within the 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR) [28]. Recent ribosome profiling studies have indicated that many of these uAUGs are recognised by scanning ribosomes suggesting that their associated uORFs are translated [911]. To date, 29 peptides encoded by uORFs have been identified in proteomic studies [1214] although there is currently no information on their functions. We have previously proposed that part of the eukaryotic proteome is composed of peptides resulting from the translation of uORFs [2].

The canonical role for uAUGs/uORFs is the regulation of protein expression by modulating translation of the main open reading frame (mORF), which is usually the longest coding sequence (CDS) present on a mRNA. In most cases uAUGs/uORFs lower translation of the mORF by reducing the number of ribosomes reaching and initiating at the main AUG start codon [1, 1518]. While there are many reports of uORFs reducing translation of the CDS [1, 16, 18], only a few studies have investigated the potential of uORFs to generate bioactive peptides [2, 12, 19, 20]. We use the term uPEPs to describe their origin as uORF-derived peptides.

Searches for cross-species conservation of uORFs can reveal those that encode potential functionally important peptides [2, 12, 19, 20]. High levels of sequence identity between uORF homologues (when compared to the mRNA as a whole) are an indication that the encoded uPEP has been maintained during evolution. Furthermore, protein coding regions generally have more synonymous substitutions than non-synonymous mutations, and that this observation can be used to predict potential protein coding regions [21]. The algorithms presented here screen uORFs for these characteristics in order to identify those encoding potential uPEPs [2]. The uPEPperoni program also includes an algorithm that produces sequence identity heatmaps which allow rapid visual inspection of conserved regions in paired mRNAs.


The uPEPperoni web application is divided into three separate utilities; a conserved uPEP search utility, a heatmap generation utility and an update utility (Figure 1). The conserved uPEP search utility takes a given query sequence or RefSeq accession number, locates uORFs based on given parameters such as uORF length and allowed distance into the mORF, then compares these uORFs against a selected reference uORF database. The uORF database is derived from the eukaryote mRNA datafiles of NCBI’s RefSeq Database major release. uPEPperoni will automatically update its uORF databases to reflect new RefSeq releases. RefSeq sequences where the start of the mORF is not defined are excluded during the uORF database building step.
Figure 1

Screenshots of the search, alignment and help pages of uPEPperoni. (A) The conserved uPEP search page showing the user-selectable settings for the RefSeq database, Ka/Ks ratio, reference heatmaps, alignment parameters and heatmap generation. (B) The heatmap alignment page showing the user-selectable settings for visual representation of the main coding sequence (CDS) and uORFs and the search parameters for uORF-length, the extent of uORF overlap into the CDS and the region of the transcript to be searched. (C) The help page. uPEPperoni is hosted on an Apache server on a Linux platform and is publically accessible free of charge at Full documentation of uPEPperoni is also accessible via links on the website. The uORF reference database is automatically rebuilt on the server shortly after each major RefSeq release. We archive previous uORF reference databases. The RefSeq release version number from which the reference database is derived is shown on the web page.

Results and discussion

To identify conserved uPEPs, a query sequence is aligned against reference uORFs using the tblastx subprogram of NCBI’s blastall standalone executable. The tblastx subprogram is used in preference to nucleotide based blast programs because of its better sensitivity and to preference selection of uPEPs conserved at the amino acid level, rather than uORFs conserved at the nucleotide level. Individual transcripts from the uORF database that are found to contain a putative uPEP homologue are paired with the query sequence, and the pair passed to the heatmap generation utility. As an alternative to receiving input sequences from the conserved uPEP search utility, the heatmap generation utility can accept user entered query/reference nucleotide sequences directly.

The mRNA sequences for each conserved query/reference uORF pair are aligned pairwise using the LAGAN toolkit [22], with match/mismatch scores and gap penalties specified by the user. We normally use a gap opening penalty of 50, no gap extension penalty, +5 for a nucleotide match and -4 for a mismatch as default parameters. Given a query sequence (Q) of length q, and a reference sequence (R), the alignment produces three sequences of equal length (m). These are; the aligned query (Q’) and aligned reference sequences (R’), comprising the query and reference sequences with alignment gaps inserted, and a match sequence (M) derived by assigning 1 to the i th element, if the i th element of the Q’ and R’ are a nucleotide match, and assigning 0 if otherwise.

The percentage identity of a region surrounding a nucleotide in Q can be calculated from M and Q’. If z is the integer part of w/2, where w is the size of the window which specifies the region of calculation when centred on a nucleotide in Q’, then for each non-gap element Q’ i in Q’, a percentage identity is calculated by the following:
f Q i = 1 z + m - i + 1 j = - z m - i M i + j , i + z > m 1 z + i j = 1 - i z M i + j , i - z 0 1 2 z + 1 j = - z z M i + j , otherwise
Placing the value of f (Q’ i ) into a vector (P) for each non-gap element Q’ i results in a vector of length q. Every element of P is then correlated to a reference heat gradient, which produces a heatmap. Heatmaps are used to visualise both the extent and degree of sequence identity between Q and R, and allow comparison between different regions, such as the 5′ and 3′ UTRs, uORFs and the mORF in any pair of transcripts. Moreover, they also allow rapid inspection for other conserved cis-elements such as miRNA target sequences and splicing regulatory elements. An example heatmap is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2

Example output showing the heatmaps produced by querying the mRNA sequence of the Homo sapiens Hairless ( HR ) transcript (NM_005144) against Mus musculus Hairless ( Hr ) (NM_021877). The solid bars above the heatmap indicate the ORFs on the transcript. The output lists the most conserved uPEPs first. The heatmap generated by the query sequence is shown first; in this case human HR aligned with mouse Hr transcript. The reciprocal heatmap generated using the reference sequence is shown below (mouse Hr transcript versus human HR). The inclusion of the Reference Alignment is selectable by the user. The unformatted aligned sequence can be viewed using a hyperlink shown above the heatmap.

In addition, uPEPperoni estimates the ratio of synonymous to non-synonymous substitution rates of the mORF and uORF using the method of Yang and Nielsen [23], implemented in a library compiled from modified source code of the yn00 program in the PAML package [24]. As synonymous substitutions are favoured in protein coding sequences, the ratio provides additional confidence on the likelihood of any given uORF to encode a bioactive peptide. Furthermore, the synonymous to non-synonymous substitution ratio of the mORF provides an internal control to which the uORF ratio can be compared, allowing for an evaluation of selective pressures on both the uORF and mORF.

In order to test the program, we employed uPEPperoni to re-examine the conserved uORFs found in our original study [2]. We confirmed the conservation of 202 uORFs and identified an additional 19 others. The conserved uORFs were confirmed using ORFfinder [25]. Importantly, with uPEPperoni we were able to extend the number of species in which conservation was found to 13 (Table 1); 147 showed conservation across several species while 55 uPEPs showed conservation between human and mouse only. The utility of this program is underscored by the output shown in Figure 3A. Here we examined the third uORF present on the Ptp4a1 transcript using uPEPperoni to make pair-wise comparisons between the human transcript and orthologs in mouse, rat, chicken, frog and fish. The heatmap compilation allows a quick visual assessment on the degree of sequence identity and readily shows the conservation of uPEP sequence. The high level of conservation in multiple species identified by uPEPperoni was confirmed using ClustalW and shows the maintenance of this peptide over relatively large evolutionary distances (Figure 3B).
Table 1

List of species with one or more conserved uPEPs using the uORFs identified in Crowe et al[2]

Species containing one or more conserved uPEPs

Number of conserved uPEPsa

Human, mouse, rat, cow, chicken, frog, monkey, horse, chimpanzee, zebra fish, salmon


Human, mouse, rat, orangutan, chicken, frog, zebra fish, salmon


Human, mouse, rat, cow, monkey, chicken, rabbit, chimpanzee


Human, mouse, rat, pig, chicken, cat, horse


Human, mouse, rat, cow, orangutan, monkey


Human, mouse, rat, cow, orangutan, pig


Human, mouse, rat, cow, orangutan, frog


Human, mouse, rat, cow, chicken, frog


Human, mouse, rat, cow, orangutan


Human, mouse, rat, orangutan, chicken


Human, mouse, rat, zebra fish, frog


Human, mouse, rat, orangutan, pig


Human, mouse, rat, pig, monkey


Human, mouse, cow, pig, orangutan


Human, mouse, rat, orangutan


Human, mouse, rat, cow, monkey


Human, mouse, rat, cow, pig


Human, mouse, rat, cow, chicken


Human, mouse, rat, cow, frog


Human, mouse, rat, cow


Human, mouse, cow, orangutan


Human, mouse, cow, pig


Human, mouse, rat, pig


Human, mouse, rat, monkey


Human, mouse, cow, monkey


Human, mouse, orangutan, chimpanzee


Human, mouse, orangutan, hamster


Human, mouse, rat, horse


Human, mouse, rat, chicken


Human, mouse, rat


Human, mouse, cow


Human, mouse, orangutan


Human, mouse, pig


Human, mouse, monkey


Human, mouse


aSpecifies the total number of individual uPEPs that show sequence conservation across the group of species indicated.
Figure 3

Several heatmaps of aligned transcript-pairs can be combined to provide a visual snapshot of sequence conservation. (A) Heatmaps for each pair-wise analysis of the human transcript encoding protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA, member 1 (Ptp4a1) (NM_003463) with the othologous non-human transcript are shown. Black lines above each heatmap mark the position of the conserved uPEP and CDS for that species. Note the conservation of this uPEP even as the phylogenetic distance between the comparison species (on the right) widens. (B) ClustalW alignment of the Ptp4a1 uPEP, translated in silico from the conserved uORF. The numbers below the bar graph represent the conservation of each individual amino acid, where 10 (shown as an asterisk (*)) indicates identity across all species.


We have developed a web tool that facilitates the identification of conserved uORFs. This tool alleviates the need to use several single-facet programs for the detection of uPEPs. UPEPperoni can be used to populate the databases employed in the identification of novel small peptides by mass spectrometry and enhance the discovery of a novel source of regulatory molecules. Given the renewed interest in the role of uORFs in human disease [1] and the possibility that peptides encoded by uORFs can have functionality beyond regulation of translation [2, 13, 26], uPEPperoni offers improved utility in their identification and will aid in their characterisation.

Availability and requirements

  • Project name: uPEPperoni: An online tool for upstream open reading frame location and analysis of transcript conservation.

  • Project home page:

  • Operating system(s): Platform independent.

  • Programming language: Server-side: Perl, C, Python, C++, HTML and JavaScript.

  • Other requirements: None.

  • License: Not applicable.

  • Any restrictions to use by non-academics: None.



upstream start codon


upstream open reading frame


main open reading frame


uORF-encoded peptide

5′ UTR: 

Five prime untranslated region

3′ UTR: 

Three prime untranslated region


Coding DNA Sequence (synonymous with mORF).



This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council [grant number 631551]. Thomas Huber is an Australian Research Council Future Fellow.

Authors’ Affiliations

School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland
Research School of Chemistry, Australian National University


  1. Calvo SE, Pagliarini DJ, Mootha VK: Upstream open reading frames cause widespread reduction of protein expression and are polymorphic among humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106 (18): 7507-7512. 10.1073/pnas.0810916106.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Crowe ML, Wang XQ, Rothnagel JA: Evidence for conservation and selection of upstream open reading frames suggests probable encoding of bioactive peptides. BMC Genomics. 2006, 7: 16-10.1186/1471-2164-7-16.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Iacono M, Mignone F, Pesole G: uAUG and uORFs in human and rodent 5′untranslated mRNAs. Gene. 2005, 349: 97-105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Pesole G, Gissi C, Grillo G, Licciulli F, Liuni S, Saccone C: Analysis of oligonucleotide AUG start codon context in eukariotic mRNAs. Gene. 2000, 261 (1): 85-91. 10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00471-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Rogozin IB, Kochetov AV, Kondrashov FA, Koonin EV, Milanesi L: Presence of ATG triplets in 5′ untranslated regions of eukaryotic cDNAs correlates with a ‘weak’ context of the start codon. Bioinformatics. 2001, 17 (10): 890-900. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.10.890.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Suzuki Y, Ishihara D, Sasaki M, Nakagawa H, Hata H, Tsunoda T, Watanabe M, Komatsu T, Ota T, Isogai T, et al: Statistical analysis of the 5′ untranslated region of human mRNA using “Oligo-Capped” cDNA libraries. Genomics. 2000, 64 (3): 286-297. 10.1006/geno.2000.6076.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Yamashita R, Suzuki Y, Nakai K, Sugano S: Small open reading frames in 5′ untranslated regions of mRnas. C R Biol. 2003, 326 (10–11): 987-991.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen CH, Liao BY, Chen FC: Exploring the selective constraint on the sizes of insertions and deletions in 5′ untranslated regions in mammals. BMC Evol Biol. 2011, 11: 192-10.1186/1471-2148-11-192.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ingolia NT, Lareau LF, Weissman JS: Ribosome profiling of mouse embryonic stem cells reveals the complexity and dynamics of mammalian proteomes. Cell. 2011, 147 (4): 789-802. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.002.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee S, Liu B, Lee S, Huang SX, Shen B, Qian SB: Global mapping of translation initiation sites in mammalian cells at single-nucleotide resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012, 109 (37): E2424-E2432. 10.1073/pnas.1207846109.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fritsch C, Herrmann A, Nothnagel M, Szafranski K, Huse K, Schumann F, Schreiber S, Platzer M, Krawczak M, Hampe J, et al: Genome-wide search for novel human uORFs and N-terminal protein extensions using ribosomal footprinting. Genome Res. 2012, 22 (11): 2208-2218. 10.1101/gr.139568.112.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Oyama M, Itagaki C, Hata H, Suzuki Y, Izumi T, Natsume T, Isobe T, Sugano S: Analysis of small human proteins reveals the translation of upstream open reading frames of mRNAs. Genome Res. 2004, 14 (10B): 2048-2052. 10.1101/gr.2384604.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Oyama M, Kozuka-Hata H, Suzuki Y, Semba K, Yamamoto T, Sugano S: Diversity of translation start sites may define increased complexity of the human short ORFeome. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2007, 6 (6): 1000-1006. 10.1074/mcp.M600297-MCP200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Slavoff SA, Mitchell AJ, Schwaid AG, Cabili MN, Ma J, Levin JZ, Karger AD, Budnik BA, Rinn JL, Saghatelian A: Peptidomic discovery of short open reading frame-encoded peptides in human cells. Nat Chem Biol. 2013, 9 (1): 59-64.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Churbanov A, Rogozin IB, Babenko VN, Ali H, Koonin EV: Evolutionary conservation suggests a regulatory function of AUG triplets in 5′-UTRs of eukaryotic genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33 (17): 5512-5520. 10.1093/nar/gki847.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kozak M: Pushing the limits of the scanning mechanism for initiation of translation. Gene. 2002, 299 (1–2): 1-34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Morris DR, Geballe AP: Upstream open reading frames as regulators of mRNA translation. Mol Cell Biol. 2000, 20 (23): 8635-8642. 10.1128/MCB.20.23.8635-8642.2000.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang XQ, Rothnagel JA: 5′-untranslated regions with multiple upstream AUG codons can support low-level translation via leaky scanning and reinitiation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32 (4): 1382-1391. 10.1093/nar/gkh305.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hayden CA, Bosco G: Comparative genomic analysis of novel conserved peptide upstream open reading frames in Drosophila melanogaster and other dipteran species. BMC Genomics. 2008, 9: 61-10.1186/1471-2164-9-61.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hayden CA, Jorgensen RA: Identification of novel conserved peptide uORF homology groups in Arabidopsis and rice reveals ancient eukaryotic origin of select groups and preferential association with transcription factor-encoding genes. BMC Biol. 2007, 5: 32-10.1186/1741-7007-5-32.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nekrutenko A, Makova KD, Li WH: The K(A)/K(S) ratio test for assessing the protein-coding potential of genomic regions: an empirical and simulation study. Genome Res. 2002, 12 (1): 198-202. 10.1101/gr.200901.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Brudno M, Do CB, Cooper GM, Kim MF, Davydov E, Program NCS, Green ED, Sidow A, Batzoglou S: LAGAN and Multi-LAGAN: efficient tools for large-scale multiple alignment of genomic DNA. Genome Res. 2003, 13 (4): 721-731. 10.1101/gr.926603.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Yang Z, Nielsen R: Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models. Mol Biol Evol. 2000, 17 (1): 32-43. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026236.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Yang Z: PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24 (8): 1586-1591. 10.1093/molbev/msm088.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sayers EW, Barrett T, Benson DA, Bolton E, Bryant SH, Canese K, Chetvernin V, Church DM, DiCuccio M, Federhen S, et al: Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39 (Database issue): D38-D51.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jorgensen RA, Dorantes-Acosta AE: Conserved peptide upstream open reading frames are associated with regulatory genes in angiosperms. Front Plant Sci. 2012, 3: 191-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar


© Skarshewski et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.