Skip to main content

Table 4 Performance of models with FCD features on named entity classification and recognition

From: Incorporating rich background knowledge for gene named entity classification and recognition

ID

Feature(model)

Classification (all terms)

Classification (OOV terms)

Named entity recognition

  

Precision

Recall

F-score

Precision

Recall

F-score

Precision

Recall

F-score

Run 1

Lexical (linear)

75.52

85.63

80.26

74.03

75.68

74.85

85.70

78.36

81.86

Run 2

FCD (linear)

81.59

87.77

84.57 (+4.31)

83.74

87.64

85.64 (+10.79)

87.98

80.70

84.18 (+2.32)

Run 3

FCD (SVD + RBF)

83.02

88.24

85.55 (+5.29)

83.12

85.31

84.2 (+9.35)

89.80

81.76

85.59 (+3.73)

Run 4

FCD (Combine (2, 3))

82.46

90.35

86.23 (+5.97)

83.21

88.35

85.7 (+10.85)

89.29

82.45

85.74 (+3.88)

Run 5

All (linear)

82.96

89.31

86.02 (+5.76)

83.65

89.16

86.32 (+11.47)

89.93

81.71

85.62 (+3.76)

Run 6

All (Combine (3, 5))

83.94

89.99

86.86 (+6.6)

83.92

88.86

86.32 (+11.47)

90.37

82.40

86.20 (+4.34)

  1. In Run 1, 2 and 5 SVMs with linear kernel are used. In Run 3, SVD is used to reduce the feature dimension and a SVM with RBF kernel is used to classify examples. In Run 3 only features related to CDF I are used. In Run 4 outputs of Run 2 and 3 are combined. Run 6 is the combination of Run 3 and Run 5.