From: DNA barcode analysis: a comparison of phylogenetic and statistical classification methods
Reference sample size | NJ | PhyML | 1-NN | CART | RF | Kernel | P < 0.05 | P < 0.01 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(A) θ = 3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
3 | 77.45 | 77.50 | 78.05 * | 77.15 | 77.35 | 76.15 | Â | Â |
5 | 84.20 * | 83.85 | 83.30 | 82.95 | 82.40 | 82.10 | Â | Â |
10 †| 87.25* | 86.30 | 87.20 | 87.15 | 86.40 | 87.15 |  |  |
25 | 92.00 * | 91.70 | 91.10 | 90.80 | 89.40 ¶ | 90.75 | 1 | 1 |
(B) θ = 30 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
3 | 82.80 | 82.95 | 83.55 * | 79.40 ¶ | 81.95 | 80.45 ¶ | 2 | 2 |
5 | 89.50 | 89.45 | 90.25 * | 86.20 ¶ | 89.30 | 86.85 ¶ | 2 | 2 |
10 †| 96.10 | 96.20 * | 95.55 | 93.50 ¶ | 95.25 | 94.00 ¶ | 1 | 1 |
25 | 98.95 | 98.95 | 99.15 * | 98.30 ¶ | 99.00 | 98.20 ¶ | 2 | 1 |