From: DNA barcode analysis: a comparison of phylogenetic and statistical classification methods
Number of species | NJ | PhyML | 1-NN | CART | RF | Kernel | P < 0.05 | P < 0.01 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(A) θ = 3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
2 †| 87.25 | 86.30 | 87.30* | 87.15 | 87.20 | 87.15 |  |  |
3 | 81.73 * | 80.77 | 80.67 | 80.40 | 80.97 | 81.10 | Â | Â |
4 | 75.80 | 75.00 | 75.40 | 75.68 | 75.95 * | 74.78 ¶ | 1 |  |
5 | 73.26 * | 72.36 | 72.58 | 72.84 | 73.22 | 70.74 ¶ | 1 | 1 |
(B) θ = 30 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
2 †| 96.10 | 96.20 * | 95.55 | 93.50 ¶ | 95.25 | 94.00 ¶ | 2 | 2 |
3 | 94.40 * | 94.23 | 94.00 | 90.93 ¶ | 93.50 | 92.10 ¶ | 2 | 2 |
4 | 93.78 * | 93.73 | 92.90 | 90.10 ¶ | 92.53 ¶ | 91.40 ¶ | 3 | 2 |
5 | 92.46 | 92.38 | 92.70 * | 88.98 ¶ | 92.08 | 90.46 ¶ | 2 | 2 |