Table 2 Comparison with STAC.
From: Identification of recurrent regions of copy-number variants across multiple individuals
STAC input: all data regions found by | overlap? | no. of regions | mean(freq) | median(conf) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
COVER | ✓ STAC | 301 | 0.084 | 25.6 |
✗ STAC | 476 | 0.021 | 31.2 | |
COMPOSITE | ✓ STAC | 372 | 0.14 | 18.6 |
✗ STAC | 433 | 0.023 | 52.5 | |
STAC | ✓ COVER | 609 | 0.15 | 23 |
✗ COVER | 259 | 0.11 | 8.1 | |
✓ COMPOSITE | 727 | 0.15 | 20.5 | |
✗ COMPOSITE | 141 | 0.07 | 7.21 | |
STAC input: filtered data regions found by | overlap? | no. of regions | mean(freq) | median(conf) |
COVER | ✓ STAC | 294 | 0.068 | 30.2 |
✗ STAC | 321 | 0.020 | 37.6 | |
COMPOSITE | ✓ STAC | 297 | 0.14 | 23.1 |
✗ STAC | 313 | 0.045 | 65.2 | |
STAC | ✓ COVER | 585 | 0.14 | 28.1 |
✗ COVER | 69 | 0.07 | 16.1 | |
✓ COMPOSITE | 595 | 0.14 | 26.8 | |
✗ COMPOSITE | 59 | 0.06 | 20.2 |