Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 9 Comparison with results reported in (Chen et al., 2006) and (Zhou, 1998) for DS5

From: Protein sequences classification by means of feature extraction with substitution matrices

Methods Accuracy % Correctly classified sequences
DDSM & C4.5 73.3 203
DDSM & SVM 82.3 228
DDSM & NB 85.9 238
DDSM & NN 78 216
Blast-based 78.3 220
AAC[27] & SVM [27] 80.5 223
pair-coupled AAC[27] & SVM [27] 77.6 215
PseAAC[27] & SVM [27] 80.5 223
SVM fusion [27] 87.7 243
AAC[28] & Component coupled [28] 79.1 219
AAC[34] & City-block distance [34] 59.9 166
AAC[35] & Euclidean distance [35] 55.2 153
AAC[36] & Neural network [36] 74.7 206
AAC[37] & SVM [37] 79.4 219
AAC[38] & LogitBoost [38] 84.1 233
AAC[39] & Rough Sets [39] 79.4 219