Skip to main content

Table 9 Comparison with results reported in (Chen et al., 2006) and (Zhou, 1998) for DS5

From: Protein sequences classification by means of feature extraction with substitution matrices

Methods

Accuracy %

Correctly classified sequences

DDSM & C4.5

73.3

203

DDSM & SVM

82.3

228

DDSM & NB

85.9

238

DDSM & NN

78

216

Blast-based

78.3

220

AAC[27] & SVM [27]

80.5

223

pair-coupled AAC[27] & SVM [27]

77.6

215

PseAAC[27] & SVM [27]

80.5

223

SVM fusion [27]

87.7

243

AAC[28] & Component coupled [28]

79.1

219

AAC[34] & City-block distance [34]

59.9

166

AAC[35] & Euclidean distance [35]

55.2

153

AAC[36] & Neural network [36]

74.7

206

AAC[37] & SVM [37]

79.4

219

AAC[38] & LogitBoost [38]

84.1

233

AAC[39] & Rough Sets [39]

79.4

219