Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison between linear ridge regression and support vector regression for single task siRNA efficacy prediction.

From: Multi-task learning for cross-platform siRNA efficacy prediction: an in-silico study

Test

RMSE

 

T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

T6

T7

Linear ridge regression

23.5544

23.0751

12.8477

30.2501

27.8395

32.8025

32.9677

SVR with linear kernel

23.6965

22.1477

13.3903

31.9928

26.1998

32.8823

32.2824

SVR with radial basis function kernel

29.6775

24.4753

13.5664

31.1238

37.2164

36.2681

43.4349

 

T8

T9

T10

T11

T12

T13

T14

Linear ridge regression

26.5710

13.6068

13.4394

36.9945

33.6679

17.3333

28.7044

SVR with linear kernel

27.0521

15.2284

25.9767

34.9588

32.8858

19.9620

30.7536

SVR with radial basis function kernel

25.6995

43.3165

25.9767

32.9811

26.6623

19.9620

25.8301

  1. "E" denotes "Experiment". Linear ridge regression and support vector regression(with linear kernel and radial basis function kernel) are trained with 50% of the data from each experiment, respectively. p-value calculated by pair t-test on linear ridge regression and SVR with linear kernel is 0.2592. p-value calculated by pair t-test on linear ridge regression and SVR with radial basis function kernel is 0.0913.