Network Analysis | Valid? | How different are the results? | |
---|---|---|---|
Topological Characteristics | Degree | No | Network statistics except average clustering coefficient are generally significantly different between the total network and stratified subnetworks |
 | Betweenness | No |  |
 | Clustering Coefficient | To some degree |  |
 | Eccentricity | No |  |
Functional Enrichment in Network | No | Proteins in different networks are enriched in context-specific functions | |
Network Hubs | Hubs in Conglomerate Networks | To some degree | 16% hubs in the total network change into non-hubs in subnetworks on average |
 | Non-hubs in Conglomerate Networks | Yes | 0.8% hubs in subnetworks are non-hubs in the total network on average, which correspond to a trivial portion (< 0.1%) of non-hubs in the total network |
Network Bottlenecks | Bottlenecks in Conglomerate Networks | To some degree | 13% bottlenecks in the total network change into non-bottlenecks in subnetworks on average |
 | Non-bottlenecks in Conglomerate Networks | Yes | 9% bottlenecks in subnetworks are non-bottlenecks in the total network on average, which correspond to a trivial portion of non-bottlenecks in the total network |
Modular Compatibility | No | Modules from the total network and those from subnetworks have low Modular Compatibility | |
Functional Enrichment in Modules | No | Modules from different networks differ in over-represented context-specific functions |