Skip to main content

Table 12 What is the effect on FunFOLD performance if the native structures are used for each target? A repeat comparison of FunFOLD performance versus the top 3 groups for at CASP9 using partial binding site definitions.

From: FunFOLD: an improved automated method for the prediction of ligand binding residues using 3D models of proteins

Group ID

N

Mean score for group

Mean score for FunFOLD

Difference in mean score

Mean Z-score for group

Mean Z-score for FunFOLD

P-value

(raw score)

P-value

(Z-score)

1 - p-value

(raw score)

1 - p-value

(Z-score)

  

MCC

BDT

MCC

BDT

MCC

BDT

MCC

BDT

MCC

BDT

MCC

BDT

MCC

BDT

MCC

BDT

MCC

BDT

FN035

22

0.714

0.644

0.621

0.541

-0.092

-0.103

0.627

0.627

0.387

0.197

0.649

0.869

0.784

0.889

0.351

0.131

0.216

0.111

FN096

25

0.696

0.620

0.617

0.534

-0.079

-0.086

0.555

0.499

0.404

0.250

0.674

0.850

0.594

0.771

0.326

0.150

0.406

0.229

FN339

25

0.668

0.606

0.617

0.534

-0.051

-0.072

0.462

0.482

0.404

0.250

0.614

0.837

0.500

0.771

0.386

0.163

0.500

0.229