Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of different algorithms

From: More accurate recombination prediction in HIV-1 using a robust decoding algorithm for HMMs

Method

Single breakpoint

1000-1000

500-1500

300-1500

Viterbi

7 (3..17)

6 (2..17)

7 (2..20)

7 (3..16)

max ball, r = 1

6 (2..16)

6 (2..18)

7 (1..19)

7 (2..16)

max ball, r = 2

5 (2..16)

6 (1..17)

6 (2..18)

6 (2..15)

max ball, r = 5

4 (1..12)

5 (3..14)

5 (3..15)

5 (2..13)

max ball, r = 7

4 (2..12)

5 (3..14)

6 (3..14)

6 (3..12)

max ball, r = 10

6 (3..10)

7 (3..14)

8 (3..14)

7 (3..10)

max ball, r = 15

7 (3..11)

9 (4..14)

10 (5..15)

7 (4..12)

min region

4 (1..13)

5 (2..14)

6 (2..16)

5 (2..14)

DualBrothers

57(45..71)

51 (42..67)

48(37..54)

45 (40..51)

  1. Shown are the median and interquartile range of differences between predicted and actual breakpoints for the four initial experiments.