Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of different algorithms

From: More accurate recombination prediction in HIV-1 using a robust decoding algorithm for HMMs

Method Single breakpoint 1000-1000 500-1500 300-1500
Viterbi 7 (3..17) 6 (2..17) 7 (2..20) 7 (3..16)
max ball, r = 1 6 (2..16) 6 (2..18) 7 (1..19) 7 (2..16)
max ball, r = 2 5 (2..16) 6 (1..17) 6 (2..18) 6 (2..15)
max ball, r = 5 4 (1..12) 5 (3..14) 5 (3..15) 5 (2..13)
max ball, r = 7 4 (2..12) 5 (3..14) 6 (3..14) 6 (3..12)
max ball, r = 10 6 (3..10) 7 (3..14) 8 (3..14) 7 (3..10)
max ball, r = 15 7 (3..11) 9 (4..14) 10 (5..15) 7 (4..12)
min region 4 (1..13) 5 (2..14) 6 (2..16) 5 (2..14)
DualBrothers 57(45..71) 51 (42..67) 48(37..54) 45 (40..51)
  1. Shown are the median and interquartile range of differences between predicted and actual breakpoints for the four initial experiments.