Skip to main content

Table 5 Performance of different prediction models on independent test set

From: HemeBIND: a novel method for heme binding residue prediction by combining structural and sequence information

Subset

Modela

Recall (%)

Precision (%)

Accuracy (%)

F1-score (%)

MCC

Single-heme

STR

76.05

28.72

77.06

41.69

0.366

 

STRRFP

72.10

31.44

80.03

43.78

0.382

 

SEQ

58.86

39.35

85.78

47.17

0.404

 

STR+SEQ

52.28

52.75

89.80

52.51

0.468

 

STRRFP+SEQ

50.54

55.78

90.34

53.03

0.477

Multi-heme

STR

87.07

51.48

69.66

64.70

0.454

 

STRRFP

86.56

52.60

70.80

65.43

0.466

 

SEQ

63.14

59.85

74.70

61.45

0.427

 

STR+SEQ

58.55

69.53

78.57

63.57

0.489

 

STRRFP+SEQ

58.25

70.18

78.76

63.66

0.493

All

STR

80.13

34.93

75.83

48.65

0.412

 

STRRFP

77.45

37.72

78.50

50.73

0.431

 

SEQ

60.44

45.36

83.94

51.83

0.431

 

STR+SEQ

54.60

58.34

87.94

56.41

0.495

 

STRRFP+SEQ

53.39

60.82

88.42

56.87

0.504

  1. aSTR, RFP and SEQ denote structure-based classifier, reducing false positives and sequence-based classifier respectively.