Skip to main content

Table 2 Properties of Bovine functional annotations

From: AIGO: Towards a unified framework for the Analysis and the Inter-comparison of GO functional annotations

Measure AFFY B2G AID
  GO Biol ogical Process
Obsolescence 0.02% 0.04% 0.0%
Coverage 41.2% 28.8% 50.1%
Richness 19.4% 24.1% 22.7%
Avg. nb annot. 3.7 5.3 4.2
Avg. Coherence 0.6 0.5 0.6
Compactness 0.3 0.3 0.4
Avg. Specificity 12.2 13.4 11.3
Avg. IC 5.4 6.0 5.1
Avg. Redundancy 18.1% 2.3% 18.4%
  GO Molecular Function
Obsolescence 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Coverage 49.3% 29.8% 52.3%
Richness 22.4% 24.5% 24.9%
Avg. nb annot. 3.2 2.8 3.3
Avg. Coherence 0.6 0.5 0.6
Compactness 0.5 0.5 0.5
Avg. Specificity 5.1 5.7 5.0
Avg. IC 4.2 4.9 4.2
Avg. Redundancy 32.7% 0.3% 31.8%
  GO Cellu lar Component
Obsolescence 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Coverage 42.7% 30.3% 51.5%
Richness 24.6% 31.4% 27.8%
Avg. nb annot. 2.7 2.5 2.7
Avg. Coherence 0.8 0.7 0.8
Compactness 0.6 0.6 0.6
Avg. Specificity 8.9 11.7 8.3
Avg. IC 3.0 3.8 2.8
Avg. Redundancy 33.2% 0.1% 31.9%
  All three aspects of GO
Obsolescence 0.01% 0.02% 0.0%
Coverage 56.4% 33.3% 60.4%
Richness 20.7% 24.9% 23.8%
Avg. nb annot. 3.2 3.5 3.4
Avg. Coherence 0.7 0.6 0.7
Compactness 0.5 0.5 0.5
Avg. Specificity 8.7 10.3 8.2
Avg. IC 4.2 4.9 4.1
Avg. Redundancy 28.0% 0.9% 27.4%
  1. The statistical properties of functional annotations in Affymetrix, Blast2GO, ArrayIDer generated by AIGO for each aspect of the gene ontology.