Skip to main content

Table 6 Performance measures of data mining algorithm at different levels of significance on A & B conditions

From: Comparative study of classification algorithms for immunosignaturing data

SIGNIFICANCE

p < 5 x 10-4

p < 5 x 10-3

p < 5 x 10-2

 

Algorithm

Acc.

Sp

Sn

AUC

Acc.

Sp

Sn

AUC

Acc.

Sp

Sn

AUC

Avg.

Naïve Bayes

87.5

83.3

91.7

0.84

91.7

83.3

100

0.97

91.7

83.3

100

0.96

90.8

VFI

79.2

75.0

83.3

0.93

91.7

83.3

100

0.95

87.5

75.0

100

0.90

87.7

K means

87.5

83.3

91.7

0.88

91.7

83.3

100

0.92

83.3

75.0

91.7

0.83

87.5

SVM

83.3

83.3

83.3

0.83

87.5

91.7

83.3

0.87

87.5

83.3

91.7

0.88

86.1

MLP

79.2

83.3

75.0

0.70

91.7

91.7

91.7

0.95

dnf

dnf

dnf

dnf

84.7*

Hyper Pipes

83.3

75.0

91.7

0.91

83.3

83.3

83.3

0.93

70.8

83.3

58.3

0.88

82.0

Logistic R.

66.7

83.3

50.0

0.76

95.8

91.7

100

0.92

79.2

83.3

75.0

0.85

81.5

Random Forest

79.2

83.3

75.0

0.91

79.2

75.0

83.3

0.86

79.2

75.0

83.3

0.78

80.6

Bayes Net

83.3

75.0

91.7

0.87

83.3

83.3

83.3

0.83

75.0

75.0

75.0

0.67

80.2

KNN

75.0

83.3

66.7

0.85

75.0

91.7

58.3

0.90

75.0

91.7

58.3

0.84

77.8

M5P

75.0

83.3

66.7

0.74

75.0

75.0

75.0

0.79

75.0

75.0

75.0

0.74

75.2

ASC

62.5

66.7

58.3

0.65

79.2

83.3

75.0

0.85

70.8

75.0

66.7

0.76

72.0

J48

62.5

66.7

58.3

0.65

79.2

83.3

75.0

0.85

66.7

75.0

58.3

0.72

70.6

Random Tree

70.8

75.0

66.7

0.70

70.8

75.0

66.7

0.70

66.7

66.7

66.7

0.67

69.3

SLR

70.8

75.0

66.7

0.80

66.7

75.0

58.3

0.77

50.0

50.0

50.0

0.60

65.0

K star

66.7

91.7

41.7

0.83

58.3

100

46.7

0.83

50.0

0.0

100

0.50

64.3

LDA

79.2

83.3

75.0

0.84

61.2

64.5

54.5

0.52

29.2

14.3

100

0.56

62.8

  1. Acc: Accuracy, Sp: Specificity, Sn: Sensitivity, AUC: Area under ROC curve, Avg: Average score in % for each algorithms, dnf: Did not Finish”, * denotes Avg. from 3 significance levels. Measures >90% are marked in bold.