Table 5 Performance comparison between the FFCA and F2C2 algorithms in terms of the number of LP problems solved ( ♯ LPs) and their total running times (TRT)
From: F2C2: a fast tool for the computation of flux coupling in genome-scale metabolic networks
FFCA | F2C2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Network | ♯ LPs | TRT | ♯ LPs | TRT | Prepr. RT |
M. barkeri, iAF 692 | 301975 | 59 m 40 s | 774 | 7 s | 5 s |
S. cerevisiae, iND 750 | 472629 | 1 h 50 m 17s | 1280 | 21 s | 15 s |
M. tuberculosis, iNJ 661 | 556504 | 3 h 5 m 36 s | 1506 | 22 s | 16 s |
E. coli, iJR 904 | 655437 | 2 h 40 m 33 s | 1580 | 26 s | 18 s |
E. coli, iAF 1260 | 4256786 | 4 d 31 m 26 s | 3309 | 2 m 47 s | 2 m |
E. coli, iJO 1366 | 4877262 | 4 d 5 h 30 m 46 s | 3955 | 3 m 55 s | 2 m 45 s |
H. sapiens, Recon 1 | 4566304 | 4 d 18 h 3 m 37 s | 3903 | 5 m 20 s | 4 m 9 s |