Skip to main content

Table 4 Validation of AuDIT.

From: Statistical characterization of multiple-reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (MRM-MS) assays for quantitative proteomics

Dataset

Annotation

TN

TP

FN

FP

Overall Accuracy (%)

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

10 Peptide Standard Curve, 3 transitions MultiQuant

Site 1

Global

89

11

119

29

33

77

80

73

  

Focused

7

144

1

8

97

99

94

 

Site 2

Global

9

217

14

30

84

94

23

  

Focused

23

247

0

0

100

100

100

 

Site 3

Global

19

200

33

18

81

86

51

  

Focused

50

218

2

0

99

99

100

 

Site 4

Global

21

162

74

13

68

69

62

  

Focused

81

174

14

1

94

93

99

10 Peptide Standard Curve, 3 transitions, Skyline

Site 1

Global

29

163

35

43

71

82

40

  

Focused

56

206

8

0

97

96

100

 

Site 2

Global

1

210

15

44

78

93

2

  

Focused

15

254

1

0

100

100

100

 

Site 5

Global

35

34

2

199

26

94

15

  

Focused

37

232

0

1

100

100

97

10 Peptide Standard Curve, 5 transitions, MultiQuant

Site 6

Global

46

16

277

122

23

69

69

67

  

Focused

8

294

0

6

99

100

97

Clinical Samples, 3 transitions, MultiQuant

Cardio-vascular Peptides

Global

4

33

5

9

73

87

31

  

Focused

9

40

0

2

96

100

82

  1. For each dataset, two contingency matrices are calculated. The 'pre-test' evaluation by the expert identifies overall data problems like poor chromatography, inaccurate peak integration, etc. Comparison of this global annotation with the algorithm calls results in one set of contingency matrices (shown under Annotation = Global). The second 'post-test' re-evaluation is based on the algorithm outcome, and accounts for the fact that the global annotation could be overly conservative (i.e., mark too many transitions as BAD). This focused annotation is compared with the algorithm-derived decisions to derive a second, algorithm-guided set of contingency matrices, shown under Annotation = Focused. TN: True Negative, TP: True Positive, FN: False Negative, and FP: False Positive. Overall Accuracy = (TP + TN)/(TP + TN + FN + FP). Sensitivity = TP/(TP + FN). Specificity = TN/(TN + FP). A transition is BAD if it has some form of interference, i.e., it is imprecise of inaccurate. If not, the transition is labeled as GOOD. Adapted from Abbatiello, Mani, et. al., Clinical Chemistry, 56, 291-305 [17].