Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of quality between our method and IsoRankN

From: Scalable global alignment for multiple biological networks

Datasets DOMAIN DIP BioGRID
Algorithms Ours IsoRankN Ours IsoRankN Ours IsoRankN
Coverage 8588 3372 24119 19555 21385 13928
Average similarity score 237.06 174.32 0.00509 0.00426 0.1735 0.0834
Conserved edges rate .260
(6111 of 23507)
.160
(615 of 3138)
.2209
(17365 of 78611)
.086
(4696 of 54364)
0.1781
(13003 of 72975)
0.0685
(2586 of 37434)
# total enriched GO terms 1026 90 3871 1893 1123 523
  1. The average similarity scores for DOMAIN dataset are computed by equation 2 and the average similarity scores for DIP and BioGRID datasets are normalized BLAST bit scores, computed by equation 1.