Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of quality between our method and IsoRankN

From: Scalable global alignment for multiple biological networks

Datasets

DOMAIN

DIP

BioGRID

Algorithms

Ours

IsoRankN

Ours

IsoRankN

Ours

IsoRankN

Coverage

8588

3372

24119

19555

21385

13928

Average similarity score

237.06

174.32

0.00509

0.00426

0.1735

0.0834

Conserved edges rate

.260

(6111 of 23507)

.160

(615 of 3138)

.2209

(17365 of 78611)

.086

(4696 of 54364)

0.1781

(13003 of 72975)

0.0685

(2586 of 37434)

# total enriched GO terms

1026

90

3871

1893

1123

523

  1. The average similarity scores for DOMAIN dataset are computed by equation 2 and the average similarity scores for DIP and BioGRID datasets are normalized BLAST bit scores, computed by equation 1.