Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison on running time of ERA, LocARNA , and RNAforester

From: Efficient alignment of RNA secondary structures using sparse dynamic programming

RNA family

length

num.

ERA

LocARNA

ERA vs.

RNAforester

ERA vs.

 

(bp)

pairs

(sec)

(sec)

LocARNA

(fold)

(sec)

RNAforester

(fold)

tRNA

78

21

0.017

0.100

5.882

0.047

2.765

Gly riboswitch

105

22

0.015

0.277

18.46

0.162

10.80

U12 spliceosome

160

42

0.035

0.311

8.886

0.657

18.77

Phage_pRNA

244

43

0.124

0.647

5.218

6.935

55.93

tmRNA

367

64

0.929

22.45

24.16

225.4

242.6

biocoid_3UTR

549

155

4.898

170.3

34.77

13.99

2.856

snR86

1004

333

53.15

4862

91.48

5.579

-9.527 ∗

Sacc_telomerase

1162

181

23.93

522.3

21.82

3697

154.5

  1. *ERA is slower than RNAforester when aligning snR86 RNA structures.