In the 16th page authors state that: "In this case [highly connected genes for both training and testing], there is a clear advantage of using NHMC with ¿ = 0 over using NHMC with ¿ = 0.5."
However, it seems that the second part of table 2 (which should be split in two different tables imho) presents the opposite.
Also, the values on the vertical axis of Figure 2 (varying between 0.2 and 0.4) are inconsistent with the values depicted on the tables.
Some remarks
10 December 2013
In the 16th page authors state that: "In this case [highly connected genes for both training and testing], there is a clear advantage of using NHMC with ¿ = 0 over using NHMC with ¿ = 0.5."
However, it seems that the second part of table 2 (which should be split in two different tables imho) presents the opposite.
Also, the values on the vertical axis of Figure 2 (varying between 0.2 and 0.4) are inconsistent with the values depicted on the tables.
Thank you!
Competing interests
None declared