Skip to main content

Table 1 Performance comparison with four other PSSM-based methods

From: MFSPSSMpred: identifying short disorder-to-order binding regions in disordered proteins based on contextual local evolutionary conservation

Test dataset

Methods

ACC

TPR

FPR

AUC

TEST419

PSSM

0.610

0.542

0.322

0.655

Smooth_PSSM

0.620

0.503

0.264

0.644

Mask_PSSM

0.609

0.492

0.273

0.648

MFSPSSMpred

0.636

0.491

0.219

0.677

 

MFS_Physi_PSSM

0.604

0.503

0.294

0.639

  1. All methods used the same outside sliding-window size of 25. Smooth_PSSM and Mask_PSSM adopted the same smoothing or masking-window size with MFSPSSMpred.
Back to article page

BMC Bioinformatics

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us