Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparing performance of our method (MCIP) with and without the use of priors to k -means clustering

From: Identifying pathogenic processes by integrating microarray data with prior knowledge

 

Heart failure data

Melanoma data

 

Sens.

Spec.

PPV

AUC

K

Sens.

Spec.

PPV

AUC

K

MCIP with priors

0.62

0.68

0.023

0.65

2

0.67

0.6

0.030

0.64

18

MCIP without priors

0.61

0.64

0.020

0.62

3

0.68

0.53

0.024

0.60

20

Kmeans

0.52

0.65

0.019

0.59

3

0.70

0.48

0.021

0.58

10

  1. The performances are obtained by evaluating the result clusters against a literature based reference network comprising pairs of genes co-cited in Pubmed articles with the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) left ventricular hypertrophy (for the heart failure data) and melanoma cancer (for the melanoma cancer data). Sens.=sensitivity, Spec. = specificity, PPV = Positive predictive value, AUC = Area under receiver operator curve, and K = number of clusters, which is automatically found by our method, and by using the Gap index for k-means clustering.