Skip to main content

Table 3 Runtime comparison of RNAEAPATH and HIPATH2

From: Analysing RNA-kinetics based on folding space abstraction

Instance

RNAEAPATH

HIPATH2

rb1

38m 49s

8m 59s

rb2

10m 31s

5m 20s

rb3

25m 45s

11m 22s

rb4

0m 02s

5m 33s

rb5

14m 31s

14m 20s

hok

443m 51s

45m 13s

SL

12m 49s

1m 31s

attenuator

15m 56s

1m 15s

s15

11m 42s

1m 06s

sbox leader

24m 47s

19m 21s

thiM leader

48m 28s

7m 41s

ms2

15m 03s

0m 25s

HDV

30m 57s

9m 50s

dsrA

14m 51s

2m 10s

ribD leader

59m 33s

24m 20s

amv

15m 05s

10m 35s

alpha operon

16m 50s

4m 59s

HIV-1 leader

37m 54s

18m 01s

Total

837m 33s

192m 09s

  1. Run times were measured as described before [14], and both programs were used with default parameters. Sequences were taken from [12, 19], and all tests were run on an 8x AMD Opteron 8378 machine with 128 GB RAM under openSUSE 11.2 (x86_64).