Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of performance measures (TP - True Positives, Sn - Sensitivity, Pr - Precision and Ac - Accuracy) between GeneMark, Glimmer, MetaGeneMark (MGM), FragGeneScan (FGS) and TransGeneScan (TGS).

From: Gene finding in metatranscriptomic sequences

Organisms

 

GeneMark

Glimmer

MGM

FGS

TGS

E. coli (2171∗)

Predicted

2039

2169

1961

1941

2159

Completely

TP

1805

1695

1642

1678

1889

Overlap

Sn

83.14

78.07

75.63

77.29

87.01

 

Pr

97.67

95.71

97.56

96.00

97.82

 

Ac

89.82

86.00

85.21

85.63

92.10

80%

TP

1996

2093

1920

1871

2117

Overlap

Sn

91.94

96.41

88.44

86.18

97.51

 

Pr

97.89

96.50

97.91

96.39

98.05

 

Ac

94.82

96.45

92.93

91.00

97.78

P. marinus (621∗)

Predicted

631

698

592

578

571

Completely

TP

488

527

482

456

501

Overlap

Sn

78.58

84.86

77.62

73.43

80.68

 

Pr

83.85

83.52

88.93

85.23

95.98

 

Ac

81.13

84.19

82.89

78.89

87.66

80%

TP

537

595

532

499

550

Overlap

Sn

86.47

95.81

85.67

80.35

88.57

 

Pr

85.10

85.24

89.86

86.33

96.32

 

Ac

85.78

90.22

87.72

83.24

92.28

R. sphaeroides (1184∗)

Predicted

1078

1121

1024

1026

1165

Completely

TP

899

891

897

879

1011

Overlap

Sn

75.93

75.25

75.76

74.24

85.39

 

Pr

98.04

97.38

98.36

97.88

97.87

 

Ac

85.58

84.90

85.59

84.44

91.20

80%

TP

1060

1097

1009

1007

1143

Overlap

Sn

89.53

92.65

85.22

85.05

96.54

 

Pr

98.33

97.86

98.54

98.15

98.11

 

Ac

93.72

95.18

91.39

91.13

97.32

  1. ∗The numbers of positive genes recovered in the assembled transcripts.