Skip to main content

Table 1 Performance comparison of tested trimmers applied to two real life datasets.

From: PEAT: an intelligent and efficient paired-end sequencing adapter trimming algorithm

 

PEAT

AR*

EA*

TG*

GATK*

SeqPrep

TM*

GSM929772 (sequence depth: 152.8M)

   

Time

1h 40m

36h 35m

3h 59m

4h 31m

14h 51m

22h 49m

12h 07m

# Trimmed

7,705,821

2,568,156

5,444,126

15,023,863

6,843,371

5,795,255

15,298,851

# Mappable

5,985,640

2,107,352

4,735,584

11,160,564

5,562,822

5,031,866

11,158,090

aTP

7,088,576

2,507,720

5,426,673

4,682,889

6,444,882

5,789,997

3,032,621

GSM929773 (sequence depth: 209.7M)

   

Time

1h32m

33h 30m

3h 40m

3h 54m

13h 55m

20h 07m

10h 51m

# Trimmed

10,587,748

3,243,421

8,659,761

17,427,938

10,191,334

9,070,298

22,184,570

# Mappable

8,791,108

2,708,858

7,604,812

13,991,491

8,755,726

7,981,609

17,451,029

aTP

10,317,323

3,177,176

8,535,723

7,535,502

10,063,241

9,062,206

5,046,115

  1. *Abbreviations: AR(AdapterRemovel); EA(ea-utils); TG(Trim_Galore); GATK (GATK ReadAdaptorTrimmer); TM(Trimmomatic)