Skip to main content

Table 3 The comparison of independent testing results between our methods and other three O-GlcNAcylation prediction tools.

From: A two-layered machine learning method to identify protein O-GlcNAcylation sites with O-GlcNAc transferase substrate motifs

Methods

TP

FN

TN

FP

Sn

Sp

Acc

MCC

Single HMM with all data

609

347

40072

20904

63.70%

65.72%

65.69%

0.076

MDD-clustered HMMs

(7 OGT HMMs)

833

123

45212

15764

87.13%

74.15%

74.38%

0.171

Two-layered model

(7 HMMs + 1 SVM)

828

128

51224

9752

86.61%

84.01%

84.05%

0.231

YinOYang

449

507

50619

10357

46.97%

83.01%

82.46%

0.097

O-GlcNAcScan

411

545

51219

9757

42.99%

84.00%

83.37%

0.089

O-GlcNAcPRED

554

402

38414

22562

57.95%

63.00%

62.92%

0.053