Table 8 IMPROVEMENT of the scale normalization methods. IMPROVEMENT is described in detail in Table 6. For a given data set, the biggest IMPROVEMENT(s) is shown in bold. The methods and data sets are described in Tables 3 and 4, respectively.
From: Evaluation of normalization methods for cDNA microarray data by k-NN classification
Location, Scale Normalization method | IMPROVEMENT (%, LIVER CANCER) | IMPROVEMENT (%, LYMPHOMA) | IMPROVEMENT (%, RENAL CELL CARCINOMA) | IMPROVEMENT (%, GASTRIC CARCINOMA) | IMPROVEMENT (%, LUNG CANCER) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N ONRM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
N ONRM, W SCALE | 8 | -13 | 11 | 22 | 3 |
N ONRM, B SCALE | -12 | -2 | 44 | -77 | -18 |
N ONRM, WB SCALE | -12 | -13 | 44 | -33 | -9 |
SL LOESS | 33 | -2 | 44 | 56 | 3 |
SL LOESS, W SCALE | 37 | 0 | 44 | 44 | 5 |
SL LOESS, B SCALE | 0 | 2 | 39 | -188 | 16 |
SL LOESS, WB SCALE | 5 | -7 | 50 | -144 | 21 |
IG LOESS | 34 | 30 | 44 | 33 | 5 |
IG LOESS, W SCALE | 30 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 12 |
IG LOESS, B SCALE | -6 | 19 | 33 | 11 | -4 |
IG LOESS, WB SCALE | 0 | 33 | 33 | 33 | -7 |
IL LOESS | 45 | 42 | 44 | 33 | 23 |
IL LOESS, W SCALE | 43 | 39 | 39 | 33 | 16 |
IL LOESS, B SCALE | 4 | 58 | 39 | -11 | 0 |
IL LOESS, WB SCALE | 0 | 61 | 39 | -22 | 12 |
IL LOESS-SL LOESS | 48 | 58 | 44 | 44 | 26 |
IL LOESS-SL LOESS, W SCALE | 48 | 49 | 44 | 78 | 26 |
IL LOESS-SL LOESS, B SCALE | 21 | 51 | 11 | -11 | 23 |
IL LOESS-SL LOESS, WB SCALE | 25 | 54 | 33 | 0 | 28 |
IG LOESS-SL FILTERW7 | 44 | 58 | 50 | 56 | 40 |
IG LOESS-SL FILTERW7, W SCALE | 46 | 53 | 50 | 56 | 42 |
IG LOESS-SL FILTERW7, B SCALE | 11 | 56 | 28 | -11 | 23 |
IG LOESS-SL FILTERW7, WB SCALE | 8 | 49 | 33 | -11 | 21 |