Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of the prediction performance for three machine learning algorithms on old data set.

From: NBA-Palm: prediction of palmitoylation site implemented in Naïve Bayes algorithm

Algorithm

Window length

3-fold cross-validation

8-fold cross-validation

Jack-Knife validation

Average MCC

Max MCC difference

  

Ac (%)

Sn (%)

Sp (%)

MCC

Ac (%)

Sn (%)

Sp (%)

MCC

Ac (%)

Sn (%)

Sp (%)

MCC

  

Naïve Bayes 1

3

85.25%

54.39%

94.21%

0.5438

86.01%

55.98%

94.72%

0.5679

86.33%

57.42%

94.72%

0.5795

0.5637

0.0357

 

4

85.97%

56.46%

94.54%

0.5677

86.29%

56.94%

94.81%

0.5776

86.44%

58.85%

94.44%

0.5851

0.5768

0.0174

 

5

85.86%

58.53%

93.80%

0.569

86.11%

58.53%

94.12%

0.5757

86.22%

58.37%

94.31%

0.5783

0.5743

0.0093

 

6

85.93%

60.13%

93.43%

0.5744

86.58%

62.68%

93.52%

0.5967

86.98%

64.11%

93.61%

0.6099

0.5937

0.0355

 

7

86.15%

60.61%

93.56%

0.5811

86.19%

60.61%

93.61%

0.5820

86.44%

61.72%

93.61%

0.5909

0.5847

0.0098

 

8

86.01%

60.29%

93.47%

0.5766

86.08%

60.13%

93.61%

0.5781

86.01%

62.20%

92.92%

0.5811

0.5786

0.0045

RBF Network 2

3

84.39%

49.92%

94.40%

0.5104

85.15%

53.91%

94.21%

0.5399

83.85%

50.72%

93.47%

0.4975

0.5159

0.0424

 

4

85.11%

53.59%

94.26%

0.5382

85.58%

55.18%

94.40%

0.5543

86.11%

57.89%

94.31%

0.5745

0.5557

0.0363

 

5

85.97%

57.10%

94.35%

0.569

85.61%

57.26%

93.84%

0.5596

85.36%

57.42%

93.47%

0.5534

0.5607

0.0156

 

6

86.04%

57.42%

94.35%

0.5716

86.11%

59.01%

93.98%

0.5767

85.79%

59.33%

93.47%

0.5689

0.5724

0.0078

 

7

85.36%

58.53%

93.15%

0.556

85.65%

57.89%

93.70%

0.5620

86.65%

58.85%

94.72%

0.591

0.5697

0.0350

 

8

85.07%

57.26%

93.15%

0.5456

85.43%

57.10%

93.66%

0.5545

86.76%

58.85%

94.86%

0.594

0.5647

0.0484

SVM 3

3

84.46%

56.62%

92.55%

0.5285

85.15%

56.14%

93.56%

0.5448

86.44%

59.81%

94.17%

0.5869

0.5534

0.0584

 

4

83.82%

59.97%

90.74%

0.5229

84.03%

58.37%

91.48%

0.5231

82.24%

52.15%

90.97%

0.4616

0.5025

0.0615

 

5

82.99%

59.81%

89.72%

0.5041

83.24%

59.97%

90.00%

0.5100

80.52%

53.11%

88.47%

0.4272

0.4804

0.0828

 

6

83.10%

62.52%

89.07%

0.5156

83.75%

63.48%

89.63%

0.5326

82.13%

60.77%

88.33%

0.4893

0.5125

0.0433

 

7

81.45%

61.72%

87.18%

0.4793

83.21%

63.48%

88.94%

0.5212

83.53%

63.16%

89.44%

0.5269

0.5091

0.0476

 

8

80.95%

61.88%

86.48%

0.4702

82.10%

63.16%

87.59%

0.4974

82.45%

63.16%

88.06%

0.5046

0.4907

0.0344

  1. 1. Default parameters of WEKA software package were used.
  2. 2. Ridge value was set to 10E-8.
  3. 3. Polynomial kernel, exponent was set to 1, complexity value C to 0.1.