Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of the prediction performance for three machine learning algorithms on new data set.

From: NBA-Palm: prediction of palmitoylation site implemented in Naïve Bayes algorithm

Algorithm

Window length

3-fold cross-validation

8-fold cross-validation

Jack-Knife validation

Average MCC

Max MCC difference

  

Ac (%)

Sn (%)

Sp (%)

MCC

Ac (%)

Sn (%)

Sp (%)

MCC

Ac (%)

Sn (%)

Sp (%)

MCC

  

Naïve Bayes 1

3

84.64%

43.95%

94.85%

0.4629

85.08%

44.08%

95.36%

0.4767

85.27%

45.31%

95.29%

0.4857

0.4751

0.0228

 

4

85.43%

49.52%

94.44%

0.5017

85.62%

51.29%

94.23%

0.512

85.76%

51.43%

94.37%

0.5162

0.51

0.0145

 

5

85.49%

51.97%

93.89%

0.5101

86.17%

53.74%

94.30%

0.5339

86.58%

54.69%

94.58%

0.5479

0.5306

0.0378

 

6

85.79%

54.01%

93.76%

0.5241

86.72%

57.28%

94.10%

0.5582

86.74%

58.37%

93.86%

0.5618

0.548

0.0377

 

7

85.65%

54.42%

93.48%

0.5216

86.52%

56.87%

93.96%

0.5519

86.58%

57.14%

93.96%

0.5541

0.5425

0.0325

 

8

85.79%

55.37%

93.42%

0.528

86.20%

57.55%

93.38%

0.545

86.25%

56.73%

93.65%

0.5442

0.5391

0.0170

RBF Network 2

3

84.12%

45.17%

93.89%

0.4516

85.05%

45.44%

94.98%

0.4794

84.62%

46.12%

94.27%

0.4684

0.4665

0.0278

 

4

84.83%

46.39%

94.47%

0.4755

85.57%

49.12%

94.71%

0.5046

85.68%

49.80%

94.68%

0.5095

0.4965

0.0340

 

5

85.32%

48.98%

94.44%

0.4971

85.35%

48.57%

94.58%

0.4967

86.91%

54.29%

95.09%

0.5565

0.5168

0.0598

 

6

85.38%

51.29%

93.93%

0.5051

85.76%

50.61%

94.58%

0.514

85.92%

50.20%

94.88%

0.5178

0.5123

0.0127

 

7

85.08%

51.16%

93.59%

0.4965

86.33%

53.47%

94.58%

0.5379

86.99%

53.88%

95.29%

0.558

0.5308

0.0615

 

8

85.43%

50.48%

94.20%

0.5043

86.42%

54.01%

94.54%

0.5416

87.15%

55.51%

95.09%

0.5664

0.5374

0.0621

SVM 3

3

84.72%

48.44%

93.82%

0.4785

85.73%

48.57%

95.05%

0.5081

85.35%

47.35%

94.88%

0.4935

0.4934

0.0296

 

4

82.84%

49.66%

91.16%

0.4349

84.89%

51.16%

93.35%

0.4914

84.78%

52.24%

92.94%

0.4919

0.4727

0.0570

 

5

83.17%

52.65%

90.82%

0.4541

85.32%

55.24%

92.87%

0.5155

86.82%

60.41%

93.45%

0.5694

0.513

0.1153

 

6

82.87%

52.79%

90.41%

0.4478

85.30%

57.55%

92.26%

0.5221

84.37%

57.55%

91.10%

0.4999

0.4899

0.0743

 

7

81.53%

53.33%

88.60%

0.4213

84.70%

58.37%

91.30%

0.5104

88.46%

64.49%

94.47%

0.6234

0.5184

0.2021

 

8

81.01%

53.33%

87.96%

0.4108

84.48%

60.54%

90.48%

0.5132

85.52%

61.22%

91.61%

0.5393

0.4878

0.1285

  1. 1. Default parameters of WEKA software package were used.
  2. 2. Ridge value was set to 10E-8.
  3. 3. Polynomial kernel, exponent was set to 1, complexity value C to 0.1.