Skip to main content

Table 3 Performance comparison of different approaches using cross-validation for the benchmark data sets.

From: Protein subcellular localization prediction based on compartment-specific features and structure conservation

  PS1302
Localization HYBRID CELLO PSORTb v.1.1 PSLpred P-CLASSIFIER
  Acc (%) MCC Acc (%) MCC Acc (%) MCC Acc (%) MCC Acc (%) MCC
CP 95.6 0.90 90.7 0.85 69.4 0.79 90.7 0.86 94.6 0.85
IM 93.3 0.94 88.4 0.92 78.7 0.85 86.8 0.88 87.1 0.92
PP 91.4 0.88 86.9 0.80 57.6 0.69 90.3 0.90 85.9 0.81
OM 96.3 0.96 94.6 0.90 90.3 0.93 95.2 0.95 93.6 0.90
EC 90.0 0.89 78.9 0.82 70.0 0.79 90.6 0.84 86.0 0.89
Overall 93.7 - 88.9 - 74.8 - 91.2 - 89.8 -
  PS1444
Localization HYBRID CELLO II PSORTb v.2.0 PSLpred P-CLASSIFIER
  Acc (%) MCC Acc (%) MCC Acc (%) MCC Acc (%) MCC Acc (%) MCC
CP 95.0 0.91 95.3 0.89 70.1 0.77 - - - -
IM 93.5 0.94 90.0 0.91 92.6 0.92 - - - -
PP 90.2 0.86 87.7 0.82 69.2 0.78 - - - -
OM 96.7 0.96 92.8 0.90 94.9 0.95 - - - -
EC 87.4 0.87 79.5 0.82 78.9 0.86 - - - -
Overall 93.2 - 90.0 - 82.6 - - - - -
  1. § The best performance of overall and individual localization sites is underlined.