Skip to main content

Table 1 Selection of Constraints.

From: Semi-supervised learning for the identification of syn-expressed genes from fused microarray and in situ image data

   Proportion of terms with lower p-values
λ + λ - # stages ≥ 3 ≥4
0.5 - 51% 48%
1.0 - 60% 56%
1.5 - 57% 49%
2.0 - 43% 46%
0.5 0.5 49% 44%
1.0 1.0 49% 52%
1.5 1.5 40% 59%
2.0 2.0 43% 47%
  1. We show the proportion of ImaGO terms with lower p-values in cMoG compared to MoG for constraints from at least 3 or 4 stages, distinct constraint weights λ+ and λ- using positive constraints only respectively positive and negative constraints. Values exceeding 50% indicate an advantage of cMoG.