Skip to main content

Table 1 Selection of Constraints.

From: Semi-supervised learning for the identification of syn-expressed genes from fused microarray and in situ image data

  

Proportion of terms with lower p-values

λ +

λ -

# stages ≥ 3

≥4

0.5

-

51%

48%

1.0

-

60%

56%

1.5

-

57%

49%

2.0

-

43%

46%

0.5

0.5

49%

44%

1.0

1.0

49%

52%

1.5

1.5

40%

59%

2.0

2.0

43%

47%

  1. We show the proportion of ImaGO terms with lower p-values in cMoG compared to MoG for constraints from at least 3 or 4 stages, distinct constraint weights λ+ and λ- using positive constraints only respectively positive and negative constraints. Values exceeding 50% indicate an advantage of cMoG.