Table 1 Performance comparison between the predictions performed using the three sets of features that were generated using the hybrid, the filter-based, and the wrapper-based feature selection methods
Feature selection method | Qtotal | Qpredicted | Qobserved | MCC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hybrid method (90 features) | 80.9 | 62.7 | 55.6 | 0.47 |
Filter-based (54 features) | 80.7 | 64.1 | 49.5 | 0.44 |
Wrapper-based (39 features) | 79.6 | 60.2 | 51.0 | 0.42 |