Table 2 Precision and Average Precision (rank dependent) for top 50 / 200 / 1000 predictions for 4 methods (TFIDF, Relative Frequency, Termine, Text2Onto) in terms of coverage of LMO and relevant vocabulary.
From: Terminologies for text-mining; an experiment in the lipoprotein metabolism domain
LMO | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Precision | AveragePrecision | |||||||
Top | TFIDF | Termine | Text2Onto | RelFreq | TFIDF | Termine | Text2Onto | RelFreq |
50 | 35% | 19% | 17% | 35% | 65% | 54% | 38% | 54% |
200 | 20% | 10% | 12% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 23% | 37% |
1000 | 8% | 4% | 5% | 8% | 21% | 12% | 12% | 20% |
LMO + Domain expert | ||||||||
Precision | Average Precision | |||||||
Top | TFIDF | Termine | Text2Onto | RelFreq | TFIDF | Termine | Text2Onto | RelFreq |
50 | 75% | 67% | 33% | 56% | 86% | 89% | 52% | 70% |
200 | 55% | 40% | 49% | 49% | 74% | 65% | 38% | 60% |
1000 | 29% | 20% | 14% | 28% | 51% | 40% | 25% | 45% |