Table 8 Comparison of the original ConText algorithm for English with the adapted ContextD algorithm for Dutch
From: ContextD: an algorithm to identify contextual properties of medical terms in a Dutch clinical corpus
| Â | Â | ConText (English) | ContextD (Dutch) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Category | Document type | Precision | Recall | F-score | Precision | Recall | F-score |
Negation | Radiology reports | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.97 | 0.93 |
| Â | Discharge letters | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.92 |
Historical | Radiology reports | - | - | - | 0.37 | 0.67 | 0.48 |
| Â | Discharge letters | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.39 | 0.78 | 0.52 |
Hypothetical | Radiology reports | - | - | - | 0.67 | 0.33 | 0.44 |
| Â | Discharge letters | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.96 | - | - | - |
Experiencer | Radiology reports | - | - | - | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Â | Discharge letters | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 |