Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison between results from Piano and piRNApredictor

From: Prediction of piRNAs using transposon interaction and a support vector machine

Species Method Dataset size t-value Se Sp ACC
Positive Negative
H. sapiens piRNApredictor 7,140 2,898 0 97.97% 8.20% 71.48%
Piano - 93.67% 44.72% 79.54%
M. musculus piRNApredictor 14,495 2,564 0 83.09% 9.52% 72.03%
Piano - 89.10% 44.15% 82.34%
R. norvegicus piRNApredictor 14,195 2,588 0 69.19% 8.42% 59.82%
Piano - 89.65% 34.58% 81.16%