# Table 3 Comparison between UNCLES and eight biclustering methods

Cluster and s UNCLESab Plaida Bimaxa FLOCa LASa BGSPa
C1 1200 0.00 0.10 1.00 1.35 0.13 0.61
82/82 20/82 4/82 6/82 21/82 1/82
C1 2000 0.00 0.64 1.06 1.38 0.16 0.75
82/82 22/82 4/82 6/82 21/82 2/82
C1 3000 0.00 0.95 1.12 1.39 0.29 0.90
82/82 37/82 4/82 6/82 18/82 0/82
C1 5000 0.04 1.28 1.21 1.40 0.45 0.06
82/82 5/82 3/82 6/82 18/82 0/82
C1 7000 0.02 0.97 0.95 1.40 0.59 0.09
82/82 30/82 4/82 6/82 19/82 0/82
C2 1200 0.00 0.76 1.21 1.36 0.31 0.96
42/42 5/42 3/42 2/42 15/42 0/42
C2 2000 0.00 0.92 1.26 1.37 0.28 0.91
42/42 16/42 3/42 3/42 15/42 0/42
C2 3000 0.33 0.99 1.29 1.38 0.32 1.00
42/42 5/42 3/42 5/42 15/42 0/42
C2 5000 0.40 1.07 1.32 1.40 0.71 1.14
42/42 5/42 3/42 2/42 13/42 0/42
C2 7000 0.43 1.18 1.30 1.40 0.70 1.17
42/42 5/42 3/42 4/42 13/42 0/42
1. aEach cell in those columns includes two values – the first is the distance from the top-left corner of the ground-truth-based F-P plots for the best cluster found by each method; the ideal is zero and the maximum is $$\sqrt{2}\cong 1.41$$; the second value is the number of data samples (data matrix columns) which the algorithms correctly found for the corresponding clusters out of the total number of correct samples (82 for type A and 42 for type B)
2. bThe number of data matrix columns (samples) are prefixed for UNCLES while being variable for biclustering methods