Skip to main content

Table 2 Performances of different models evaluated by 20 runs of 5-CV

From: Predicting potential drug-drug interactions by integrating chemical, biological, phenotypic and network data

Method

Similarity

Index

AUC

AUPR

Recall

Precision

Accuracy

F

Neighbor recommender

Method

Substructure

1

0.936

0.759

0.765

0.617

0.950

0.683

Target

2

0.820

0.365

0.338

0.548

0.867

0.418

Transporter

3

0.714

0.329

0.290

0.389

0.862

0.331

Enzyme

4

0.756

0.377

0.471

0.346

0.909

0.399

Pathway

5

0.812

0.571

0.657

0.474

0.932

0.550

Indication

6

0.912

0.599

0.555

0.591

0.923

0.572

Label

7

0.936

0.754

0.750

0.618

0.949

0.678

Off label

8

0.940

0.768

0.765

0.629

0.951

0.691

CN

9

0.941

0.767

0.745

0.635

0.949

0.685

AA

10

0.941

0.767

0.747

0.634

0.949

0.686

RA

11

0.943

0.770

0.752

0.634

0.950

0.688

Katz

12

0.937

0.735

0.707

0.608

0.944

0.653

ACT

13

0.931

0.752

0.723

0.618

0.947

0.667

RWR

14

0.941

0.766

0.746

0.634

0.949

0.685

Random walk

Method

Substructure

15

0.936

0.758

0.763

0.616

0.950

0.681

Target

16

0.852

0.559

0.596

0.501

0.927

0.544

Transporter

17

0.713

0.363

0.297

0.381

0.864

0.329

Enzyme

18

0.760

0.470

0.657

0.344

0.927

0.451

Pathway

19

0.811

0.594

0.709

0.479

0.937

0.572

Indication

20

0.941

0.777

0.768

0.641

0.952

0.699

Label

21

0.936

0.760

0.764

0.621

0.950

0.685

Off label

22

0.937

0.763

0.761

0.627

0.950

0.688

CN

23

0.938

0.757

0.736

0.625

0.948

0.676

AA

24

0.938

0.755

0.734

0.624

0.947

0.675

RA

25

0.937

0.748

0.729

0.616

0.946

0.667

Katz

26

0.937

0.750

0.730

0.619

0.946

0.669

ACT

27

0.930

0.748

0.727

0.632

0.938

0.671

RWR

28

0.939

0.764

0.742

0.635

0.949

0.684

Matrix perturbation method

 

29

0.948

0.782

0.755

0.666

0.952

0.707