Table 2 Comparison of haplotype frequencies using distance\( d \), maximal absolute difference between frequencies \( \textcolor[rgb]{1,0,0}{\backslash}\textcolor[rgb]{1,0,0}{\mathrm{increment}} \), and first rank with a relative deviation larger than 0.05, \( \rho \)
Data | Remark | \( d \) | \( \triangle \) | \( \rho \) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
First artificial population | Integer-valued genotype numbers | \( 1.3\times {10}^{-4} \) | \( 9.04\times {10}^{-7} \) | None |
Integer-valued genotype numbers and NMDP codes | \( 0.11\pm 0.02 \) | \( \left(4\pm 1\right)\times {10}^{-3} \) | \( 14\pm 6 \) | |
Second artificial population | Hapl-o-Mat – Population | \( 0.200 \) | \( 3.1\times {10}^{-3} \) | \( 1 \) |
Arlequin – Population | \( 0.202 \) | \( 3.2\times {10}^{-3} \) | \( 1 \) | |
Arlequin – Hapl-o-Mat | \( 0.027 \) | \( 2.2\times {10}^{-4} \) | \( 106 \) | |
Real genotype data | Hapl-o-Mat – Arlequin | \( 0.072\pm 0.002 \) | \( \left(9\pm 2\right)\times {10}^{-4} \) | \( 41\pm 23 \) |