Table 4 Comparisons between outputs generated by different conditions of OrthoReD, OrthologID, and OrthoDB
From: OrthoReD: a rapid and accurate orthology prediction tool with low computational requirement
Database | FLY | PLANT | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conditions Compared | ReD_s.aln | ReD_s.aln | ReD_s.aln | ReD_f.aln | ReD_f.aln | OID | ReD_AB | ReD_SW | ReD_n5 | ReD_n6 | ReD_n7 | ReD_n8 | ReD_n9 | ReD_n10 | ReD_n5 | ReD_n5 | ReD_AB | ReD_n5 | ReD_n6 | ReD_n7 | ReD_n8 | ReD_n9 |
ReD_f.aln | OID | ODB | OID | ODB | ODB | OID | OID | OID | OID | OID | OID | OID | OID | ReD_AB | ReD_SW | ReD_SW | ReD_n6 | ReD_n7 | ReD_n8 | ReD_n9 | ReD_n10 | |
average % id | 96.4% | 88.1% | 81.2% | 88.2% | 81.4% | 80.5% | 58.7% | 59.8% | 60.5% | 61.1% | 61.2% | 61.3% | 61.6% | 61.8% | 77.9% | 72.2% | 71.0% | 82.3% | 85.8% | 85.7% | 86.1% | 87.3% |
% 100% id | 89.5% | 68.1% | 55.1% | 68.3% | 55.1% | 56.2% | 33.9% | 36.1% | 35.4% | 36.4% | 36.8% | 36.9% | 37.4% | 37.7% | 58.1% | 53.2% | 51.3% | 62.0% | 69.0% | 70.0% | 71.0% | 80.6% |
% > =90% id | 92.2% | 76.7% | 66.7% | 76.8% | 67.0% | 67.1% | 41.2% | 42.6% | 43.3% | 44.4% | 44.8% | 44.9% | 45.5% | 45.9% | 65.4% | 59.3% | 57.8% | 72.2% | 77.8% | 77.8% | 78.8% | 87.3% |