Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of results obtained from graphs based on asserted axioms vs graphs semantically generated

From: Inferring ontology graph structures using OWL reasoning

Relationship

Species

Database

Type of interaction

AUC

SRvsELK(false)

SRvsELK(true)

ELK(false)vsELK(true)

    

SR

ELK (true)

ELK (false)

AUC difference

Two-tailed test

AUC difference

Two-tailed test

AUC difference

Two-tailed test

SubClassOf

Mouse

GA

IGI

0.88643

0.90463

0.90463

-0.01820

1.54×10−05

-0.01820

1.54×10−05

0

1

 

Yeast

BG

Genetic

0.64086

0.651407

0.651407

-0.01055

2.93×10−22

-0.01055

2.93×10−22

0

1

  

BG

Physical

0.70577

0.71460

0.71460

-0.00882

1.88×10−10

-0.00882

1.88×10−10

0

1

SubClassOf PartOf

Yeast

BG

Physical

0.70723

0.71559

0.71559

-0.00836

1.36×10−09

-0.00836

1.36×10−9

0

0.99984

SubClassOf PartOf Regulates

Mouse

GA

IGI

0.88979

0.90772

0.90767

-0.01793

1.61×10−05

-0.017988

1.71×10−05

5.10×10−05

0.98979

 

Yeast

BG

Genetic

0.64785

0.65923

0.65923

-0.01138

1.22×10−24

-0.01138

1.20×10−24

− 2.00×10−06

0.99832

  

BG

Physical

0.70944

0.71756

0.71755

-0.00812

3.66×10−09

-0.00811

3.83×10−09

1.00×10−05

0.99394

  1. We have generated three types of graphs: a) only taking into account SubClassOf relationship; b) considering SubClassOf and PartOf; and c) finally SubClassOf, PartOf and Regulates. The table shows the performance obtained from predicting genetic and physical interactions for those model organisms that the statistical tests provide a significant results