Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of results obtained from graphs based on asserted axioms vs graphs semantically generated

From: Inferring ontology graph structures using OWL reasoning

Relationship Species Database Type of interaction AUC SRvsELK(false) SRvsELK(true) ELK(false)vsELK(true)
     SR ELK (true) ELK (false) AUC difference Two-tailed test AUC difference Two-tailed test AUC difference Two-tailed test
SubClassOf Mouse GA IGI 0.88643 0.90463 0.90463 -0.01820 1.54×10−05 -0.01820 1.54×10−05 0 1
  Yeast BG Genetic 0.64086 0.651407 0.651407 -0.01055 2.93×10−22 -0.01055 2.93×10−22 0 1
   BG Physical 0.70577 0.71460 0.71460 -0.00882 1.88×10−10 -0.00882 1.88×10−10 0 1
SubClassOf PartOf Yeast BG Physical 0.70723 0.71559 0.71559 -0.00836 1.36×10−09 -0.00836 1.36×10−9 0 0.99984
SubClassOf PartOf Regulates Mouse GA IGI 0.88979 0.90772 0.90767 -0.01793 1.61×10−05 -0.017988 1.71×10−05 5.10×10−05 0.98979
  Yeast BG Genetic 0.64785 0.65923 0.65923 -0.01138 1.22×10−24 -0.01138 1.20×10−24 − 2.00×10−06 0.99832
   BG Physical 0.70944 0.71756 0.71755 -0.00812 3.66×10−09 -0.00811 3.83×10−09 1.00×10−05 0.99394
  1. We have generated three types of graphs: a) only taking into account SubClassOf relationship; b) considering SubClassOf and PartOf; and c) finally SubClassOf, PartOf and Regulates. The table shows the performance obtained from predicting genetic and physical interactions for those model organisms that the statistical tests provide a significant results
\