Table 3 Performances of Shrinkage Clustering on Simulated, Iris and Wine data, where the clustering assignments are compared against the three simulated centers, three Iris species and three wine types respectively
From: Shrinkage Clustering: a fast and size-constrained clustering algorithm for biomedical applications
Simulated | Iris | Wine | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Center | C1 | C2 | C3 | Species | C1 | C2 | Type | C1 | C2 | C3 |
(-2,2) | 0 | 49 | 1 | setosa | 50 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 59 | 0 |
(-2,-2) | 0 | 1 | 49 | versicolor | 0 | 50 | 2 | 59 | 6 | 0 |
(2,0) | 50 | 0 | 0 | virginica | 0 | 50 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 48 |