Skip to main content

Table 3 Performances of Shrinkage Clustering on Simulated, Iris and Wine data, where the clustering assignments are compared against the three simulated centers, three Iris species and three wine types respectively

From: Shrinkage Clustering: a fast and size-constrained clustering algorithm for biomedical applications

Simulated Iris Wine
Center C1 C2 C3 Species C1 C2 Type C1 C2 C3
(-2,2) 0 49 1 setosa 50 0 1 0 59 0
(-2,-2) 0 1 49 versicolor 0 50 2 59 6 0
(2,0) 50 0 0 virginica 0 50 3 0 6 48