Skip to main content

Table 2 High-CpG promoters have a different signature from that of low-CpG promoters

From: HebbPlot: an intelligent tool for learning and visualizing chromatin mark signatures

Mark

Known

Average dotsim

H3K4me3

57

-0.98452

H3K9ac

24

-0.82137

H3K27ac

49

-0.72655

H2BK120ac

6

-0.53278

H4K91ac

5

-0.48083

H3K4me2

16

-0.33263

H3K23ac

6

-0.32737

H2A.Z

14

-0.27855

H2BK12ac

5

-0.20927

H2BK5ac

6

-0.15632

H3K4ac

6

-0.15405

H4K8ac

6

-0.12716

H2AK5ac

6

-0.11522

H3K14ac

5

-0.03981

H3K18ac

6

0.14699

H3K4me1

57

0.24636

H3K79me1

6

0.35168

H3K79me2

14

0.62139

H3K36me3

57

0.65545

H4K20me1

12

0.82929

H3K27me3

57

0.92651

H3K9me3

57

0.97729

  1. Active promoters in 57 tissues/cell types were divided into two groups according to their CpG contents. Then two networks were trained on the two groups, producing two signatures for each tissue/cell type. The two signatures of a mark in the same tissue were compared using the dotsim function. The average dotsim values are listed under “Average dotsim.” Not all marks were determined for all tissues. The number of tissues/cell types, for which a mark was determined, is listed under the column titled “Known”