Skip to main content

Table 8 Evaluating EIM on some eukaryotic datasets

From: Assessing the impact of exact reads on reducing the error rate of read mapping

Assembly

EIM (v2)

Bowtie2

Human chromosome 1

  

Contigs-500

2497

5018

N50 (kbp)

420.7

158.2

Errors

115381

120726

IUPAC-codes

7862

158247

Genome-Fraction (%)

99.828

99.614

Remapped-Reads (%)

52.02

50.95

Human chromosome 10

  

Contigs-500

1443

2478

N50 (kbp)

399.9

149.2

Errors

70478

73842

IUPAC-codes

5508

112333

Genome-Fraction (%)

99.209

99.034

Remapped-Reads (%)

51.72

49.93

Human chromosome 21

  

Contigs-500

1239

2362

N50 (kbp)

237.8

101

Errors

22904

23579

IUPAC-codes

3232

46155

Genome-Fraction (%)

99.114

97.73

Remapped-Reads (%)

44.58

42.23

Arabidopsis Thaliana (bur-0)

  

Contigs-500

6936

6987

N50 (kbp)

428.8

417.4

Errors

136539

179312

IUPAC-codes

4842

2370

Genome-Fraction (%)

98.634

98.572

Remapped-Reads (%)

66.32

65.24

  1. The evaluation metrics has been defined in the text. The columns headed ’EIM (v2)’ and ’Bowtie2’ represent the contiguity and quality of contigs obtained based on the results of EIM (v2) and Bowtie2, respectively