Skip to main content

Table 8 Evaluating EIM on some eukaryotic datasets

From: Assessing the impact of exact reads on reducing the error rate of read mapping

Assembly EIM (v2) Bowtie2
Human chromosome 1   
Contigs-500 2497 5018
N50 (kbp) 420.7 158.2
Errors 115381 120726
IUPAC-codes 7862 158247
Genome-Fraction (%) 99.828 99.614
Remapped-Reads (%) 52.02 50.95
Human chromosome 10   
Contigs-500 1443 2478
N50 (kbp) 399.9 149.2
Errors 70478 73842
IUPAC-codes 5508 112333
Genome-Fraction (%) 99.209 99.034
Remapped-Reads (%) 51.72 49.93
Human chromosome 21   
Contigs-500 1239 2362
N50 (kbp) 237.8 101
Errors 22904 23579
IUPAC-codes 3232 46155
Genome-Fraction (%) 99.114 97.73
Remapped-Reads (%) 44.58 42.23
Arabidopsis Thaliana (bur-0)   
Contigs-500 6936 6987
N50 (kbp) 428.8 417.4
Errors 136539 179312
IUPAC-codes 4842 2370
Genome-Fraction (%) 98.634 98.572
Remapped-Reads (%) 66.32 65.24
  1. The evaluation metrics has been defined in the text. The columns headed ’EIM (v2)’ and ’Bowtie2’ represent the contiguity and quality of contigs obtained based on the results of EIM (v2) and Bowtie2, respectively