Fig. 6From: FoPA: identifying perturbed signaling pathways in clinical conditions using formal methodsComparing false-positive rates produced by four methods: The percentage of all pathways found significant at different significance thresholds is reported for each method with a vertical bar (the scale is logarithmic). The horizontal lines indicate the expected number of false positives at each threshold. Methods are ranked from best to worst according to their false positive ratesBack to article page